The SSPX priests in
Italy agree with me- LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican
Council II refer to only hypothetical cases. This is how I interpret them.But
the SSPX leadership at Econe is not
confirming this. This is something obvious, that LG 8 , LG 16 etc are not
literal cases and are only hlypothetical said Fr.Aldo Rossi the SSPX Prior in
Albano, Italy.
Instead the Superior
General, past and present, accept the New Theology in the interpretation of
Vatican Council II i.e LG 8, LG 14, LG
16 etc are exceptions for EENS ( with no exceptions). So it is implied that these
are references to visible and known people in the present times saved outside
the Catholic Church without faith and the baptism of water.
Archbishop Lefebvre made a mistake when he
chose to interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, etc as being exceptions for EENS and Tradition.He projected hypothetical cases as being physically visible in the present times. The SSPX bishops maintained the error and criticized Fr. Leonard Feeney.This is an ideological and political interpretation of Vatican Council II supported by the popes. - Lionel Andrades
DECEMBER 5, 2021
Now with the Lefebvrists and this Feeneyite community using the False Premise they maintain the liberal-traditionalist division in the Church. They are supporting ‘the development of doctrine’. Without the False Premise there is no development of doctrine.
https://www.saintbenedict.com/about-us/
With Vatican Council II interpreted with the False Premise( irrespective if they accept or reject the non traditional conclusion) Brother Thomas Augustine MICM and the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, Still River, MA.,USA contradict the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus held by Fr. Leonard Feeney and the other .The community has been 're-founded by Brother Hugh MacIsaac in 1976 in the spirit of Father Leonard Feeney'.
Theologically they are also in a rupture with the Nicene Creed since in Vatican Council II there are exceptions, to ‘I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins’. LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are exceptions. They are also exceptions for EENS ( Feeneyite). It would be different if the community was interpreting Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise.
Vatican Council II, irrational indicates that they will interpret the Catechism of Pope Pius X with 29Q ( invincible ignorance) being an exception for 24Q and 27 Q ( outside the Church there is no salvation).This is the same error made by the Lefebvrists and liberals.
So even though they offer/ attend the Latin Mass they use the New Theology, with the False Premise, which is the same as that at Holy Mass in the vernacular.They are liberals who attend the Latin Mass, the same as the Society of St. Pius X.
The division between traditionalists and liberals does not come with the Latin Mass but the use of the False or Rational Premise.If traditiionalists and liberals avoided the False Premise they return to the past ecclesiocentric ecclesiology and are conservatives.They also do not give the liberals/ progressivists and opportunity to quote Vatican Council II and support their liberalism.
Now with the Lefebvrists and this Feeneyite community using the False Premise they maintain the liberal-traditionalist division in the Church. They are supporting ‘the development of doctrine’. Without the False Premise there is no development of doctrine.
There are no ‘reforms of Vatican Council II’ the Council is no more a ‘new revelation’ or ‘new revolution’ in the Catholic Church when the Rational Premise is used to interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc..
DECEMBER 4, 2021
Brother Thomas Augustine MICM in the Diocese of Worcester and the community are interpreting Vatican Council II with the New Theology.So they would be interpreting other Magisterial Documents with the same False Premise, when the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance are mentioned
Bishop Thomas Augustine MICM and the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, Still River, MA,USA, have received canonical recognition in the Diocese of Worcester, USA since they accept Vatican Council II interpreted with the False Premise by Bishop Robert McManus.The bishop of Worcester does not affirm Vatican Council II ( rational).Vatican Council II ( rational ) is in harmony with extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) with no exceptions as held by Brother Thomas Augustine MICM and the community at Still River, Mass.So with Vatican Council II ( irrational ) they are following the same theology as the liberals and Lefebvrists.That they go for the Latin Mass does not make a difference.
They are interpreting Vatican Council II with the New Theology.So they would be interpreting other Magisterial Documents with the same False Premise, when the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance are mentioned. -Lionel Andrades
https://immaculateheartschool.org/about/
https://www.saintbenedict.com/sisters-micm/
_________________
DECEMBER 5, 2021
Trending : Archbishop Lefebvre's books are now obsolete
AUGUST 5, 2017
Archbishop Lefebvre's books are now obsolete
Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre was correct. Vatican Council II(Cushingite) was a rupture with Tradition. It was heretical.He was right to reject it.
VATICAN COUNCIL II HAS CHANGED DOGMA ACCORDING TO POPE BENEDICT XVI
ARCHBISHOP LEFEBVRE WAS CORRECT TO REJECT ALL THIS
This person would have to live in our reality. We would have to know his name and surname.
How can we humans know of someone saved outside the Church? He would be in Heaven. How can we see people in Heaven saved with the baptism of desire or in invincible ignorance and without the baptism of water? This would be known only to God.
For us humans this is ' a zero case' as John Martignoni, the apologist puts it.The baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance are not exceptions to the dogma EENS said Archbishop Thomas E.Gullickson.
Fr.Stefano Visintin osb, the new Benedictine Rector at the Pontifical University of St. Anselm, Rome agrees with him.
MYSTICI CORPORIS REFERS TO A HYPOTHETICAL CASE
Cardinal Cushing imposed the leftist excommunication on Fr. Leonard Feeney for over 19 years.So it gave him time to place the mistake in Vatican Council. The excommunication was political and supported by the Jewish Left.
ARCHBISHOP LEFEBVRE'S WRITINGS DO NOT APPLY TO VATICAN COUNCIL II (FEENEYITE)
Here is Bishop Fellay making the mistake.
MISTAKES BY BISHOP FELLAY AND FR. PIER PAOLO PETRUCCI
The same declaration (LG, 8) also recognizes the presence of “salvific elements” in non-Catholic Christian communities. The decree on ecumenism goes even further, adding that “the Spirit of Christ does not refrain from using these churches and communities as means of salvation, which derive their efficacy from the fullness of grace and truth entrusted to the Catholic Church.” (UR, 3)Such statements are irreconcilable with the dogma “No salvation outside of the Church, which was reaffirmed by a Letter of the Holy Office on August 8, 1949". -Bishop Bernard Fellay (April 13, 2014 ) Letter to Friends and Benefactors no. 82 2The same mistake was made by Father Pier Paulo Petrucci the present Superior of the SSPX at Albano, Italy. 3
ROME CAN COME BACK TO THE FAITH WITH VATICAN COUNCIL II (FEENEYITE)
When they accept or proclaim Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite, with LG 16 referring to an invisible case ) they are not rejecting Vatican Council II and neither are they rejecting Tradition.Instead as Archbishop Lefebvre suggested they can ask Rome to come back to the faith.IThey can do this in a simple way.They can choose a rational and traditional interpretation of the Council .It has an obvious continuity with the past and no ambiguity within it.
ROME CAN COME BACK TO THE FAITH WITH VATICAN COUNCIL II (FEENEYITE)
When they accept or proclaim Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite, with LG 16 referring to an invisible case ) they are not rejecting Vatican Council II and neither are they rejecting Tradition.Instead as Archbishop Lefebvre suggested they can ask Rome to come back to the faith.IThey can do this in a simple way.They can choose a rational and traditional interpretation of the Council .It has an obvious continuity with the past and no ambiguity within it.
WRONG TO EXCOMMUNICATE HIM
SSPX Italy is not affirming Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) for political reasons
NOVEMBER 4, 2016
Bishop Bernard Fellay interprets Vatican Council II with the irrational premise and conclusion : there is an option, a rational conclusion of which he is unaware of http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/11/bishop-bernard-fellay-interprets.html
JANUARY 12, 2016
Fr. Pierpaolo Petrucci, Superior General,SSPX , Italy makes the familiar SSPX error http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/01/fr-pier-paolo-petrucci-superior.html
________________________________________________________
DECEMBER 4, 2021
The Lefebvrists need to avoid the False Premise of the liberals : they interpret BOD, BOB and I.I with the false interpretation.
The Lefebvrists need to avoid the False Premise of the liberals. They need to interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise. They also need to affirm extra ecclesiam nulla salus with no exceptions.This is possible when they interpret the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I), with a Rational Premise. Presently they interpret BOD, BOB and I.I with the false interpretation.
Lionel Andrades
Promoter of the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council II.Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral.
Catholic lay man in Rome,
Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.
It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms.There can be two interpretations.
Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, non traditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional ?
Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission )
E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com
___________________
No comments:
Post a Comment