Bishop Robert Barron and John Allen Jr., were cheating with their book which was sold at the Los Angeles Religious Conference and was based upon Vatican Council II interpreted with the Fake Premise

 Bishop Robert Barron and John Allen Jr., were cheating with their book which was sold at the Los Angeles Religious Conference.In their New Evangelisation they interpret Vatican Council II, knowingly with the False Premise to create a rupture with Catholic Tradition, which was exclusivist on salvation.

Bishop Barron and John Allen were proclaiming Jesus without the necessity of membership in the Church, without the reference to Hell and without the reference to mortal sins of faith.

In the past they could put aside the original teachings of the Church Fathers on salvation by saying that Vatican Council II ( Irrational), interpreted with the False Premise, contradicts extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). But now we know that we can interpret Vatican Council II (rationally) with the Rational Premise and there are no exceptions mentioned in the text for the strict interpretation of EENS, which would be rejected by Catholics in ignorance, at the L.A Conference.

So Barron and Allen have produced a politically -correct -with -the -Left book which denies the Athanasius Creed and considers it Catholic.

They both know that there are two interpretations of Vatican Council II, their’s and mine, and the conclusion is different.They are intentionally choosing the Fake Premise to produce a break with Tradition and which would contribute towards the New Ecumenism in a  New World Order.

Without the Fake Premise there would not be the New Theology, New Evangelisation and New Ecumenism.

Scott Hahn praised this book because he too interprets Vatican Council II with a Fake Premise to produce a rupture with the dogma EENS which was affirmed by the Vendees, St. John of Arc and the Cristoforos in Mexico, whom he refers to at times.

Similarly Ralph Martin’s books are also written with the Fake and not Rational Premise in the interpretation of Vatican Council II. So he does not have to affirm the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.

So he was invited at the Synod for the New Evangelisation.His books are approved by writers on Vatican Council II who also use the Fake Premise and then suggest that non Catholics do not need to convert into the Catholic Church for salvation.This is their New Evangelisation.

Bishop Barron could not tell Ben Shapiro that he needs to enter the Catholic Church for salvation. This is the New Evangelisation.They interpret Lumen Gentium with the Fake Premise and then project non existing exceptions for John 3:5 and Mark 16:16.

This is what Barron and Allen are doing in their books.

They are proclaiming Jesus in a vague way without mentioning that outside the Catholic Church there is no known salvation in the present times.There are no practical exceptions for Magisterial Documents which they re-interpret with the False Premise.

There were people at the L.A Conference who were catechizing at the parish level, who do not know that all non Catholics are oriented to Hell, with no known exceptions, unless they convert into the Catholic Church and that this is the traditional teaching of Vatican Council II, interpreted rationally.

With the Fake Premise they are influenced by the culture which rejects the Church Fathers, the missionaries of the 16th century and the traditional Catholic ecclesiology which is exclusivist, after Vatican Council II (rational).

-Lionel Andrades