After reading this article on Rorate Caeili know that the Council is today being interpreted as a continuity with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors. This is possible without using the Irrational Premise of Don Pietro Leone and Rorate Caeili.

 

60 Years of Vatican II - ‘THE COUNCIL AND THE ECLIPSE OF GOD' by Don Pietro Leone - CHAPTER 10: The Causes of Council Teaching

https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2022/10/the-council-and-eclipse-of-god-by-don.html#more

After reading this article on Rorate Caeili know that the Council is today being interpreted as a continuity with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors. This is possible without using the Irrational Premise of Don Pietro Leone and Rorate Caeili. It is possible irrespective of Congar, Ratzinger and Rahner were present there in 1965. The Council is orthodox today irrespective that Pope Paul VI chose the False and not Rational Premise.

Not too long ago Bishop Athanasius Schneider said in Kazakhstan that there is salvation in only Jesus and in only the Catholic Church. He could say this since he was interpreting the baptism of desire (LG 14) etc with the Rational Premise (invisible cases are invisible in 2022). So Vatican Council II did not have any objective exceptions in its text for the past ecclesiocentrism with no exceptions. This ecclesiocentrism is not affirmed by Don Pietro Leone. For him the baptism of desire etc refer to visible exceptions for extra ecclesiam nulla salus in 2022. So he interprets the Council like the present two popes, who use the False Premise to justify the New Ecumenism and reject the ecumenism of return to the Catholic Church.  -Lionel Andrades