The SSPX must ask Pope Benedict to apologize for not telling Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre that the Council can be interpreted with a Rational Premise, with the Blue values on the charts, with the rational Blue Column, with the Red not being an exception for the Blue.The Council is orthodox and traditional.

 

The SSPX must ask Pope Benedict to apologize for not telling Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre that the Council can be interpreted with a Rational Premise, with the Blue values on the charts, with the rational Blue Column, with the Red not being an exception for the Blue.The Council is orthodox and traditional.

It was the popes who wanted a political interpretation of Vatican Council II and did not want to affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus with no exceptions. In this way they created a theological and doctrinal break with the Patristic period.

So with the Irrational Premise they made the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX obsolete.

Pope Benedict also refused to grant canonical recognition to the SSPX and said that the issue was doctrinal. He meant the SSPX had to accept Vatican Council II with the Irrational Premise, Inference and Conclusion for a break with Tradition.

Now the SSPX can refuse to interpret the Council without the Rational Premise.They must choose only the Rational Premise, Inference and Conclusion. They must also insist that Pope Benedict only interpret the Council with the Rational Premise. -Lionel Andrades

 OCTOBER 9, 2022

After reading this article on Rorate Caeili know that the Council is today being interpreted as a continuity with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors. This is possible without using the Irrational Premise of Don Pietro Leone and Rorate Caeili.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/10/after-reading-this-article-on-rorate.html