From Twitter
Fr.Leonard Feeney was excommunicated for affirming the traditional interpretation of the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation, extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).He did not say that invisible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance were visible examples of salvation outside the Church and exceptions for EENS.
The excommunication of Fr.Leonard Feeney was political. Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre too was excommunicated for not accepting Vatican Council II with invisible cases of LG 14 and 16 being allegedly visible examples of salvation outside the Church and a break with EENS.
Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and Fr. Leonard Feeney were excommunicated because they did not accept the irrational and heretical interpretation of Lumen Gentium 14( baptism of desire) and Lumen Gentium 16( saved in invincible ignorance) y the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF), Vatican and the Left. They both had to accept invisible people as being being visible. Then they had to infer that these were known cases.
So the CDF has issued a Decree of Prohibitions against Brother Andre Marie micm and the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary at the St.Benedict Center, in Richmond, New Hampshire, USA, for not accepting invisible cases of being saved in invincible ignorance as being visible exceptions for Feeneyite EENS.
Also the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) were not granted canonical recognition by Pope Benedict XVI, who said it was a doctrinal issue, since the SSPX had to accept Vatican Council II as a break with EENS and not a continuity with EENS. They had to confuse what is invisible as being visible, as did the popes.
The Congregatio Mariae Reginae Immaculatae (CMRI) of Bishop Mark Pivarunas and the Most Holy Family Monastery of Peter and Michael Dimond in the USA, are not being invited into the Church by Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican. Since they all have to interpret LG 14 and 16 irrationally to create a break with Feeneyite EENS, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX etc, as do the CDF and the present two popes.
If the Franciscans of the Immaculate would interpret Vatican Council II with invisible cases of LG 14 and 16 as being physically visible exceptions for 12th century EENS they would hold the same Cushingite doctrinal position of the CDF and the political popes.
The CMRI and MHFM cannot be invited into the Church since they are not liberals who confuse physically invisible cases as being physically visible as did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger and Pope John Paul II and now Pope Francis.
So today Life Site News and the German bishops interpret Vatican Council II with invisible cases of LG 14 and 16 being visible exceptions for the 12th century strict interpretation of EENS. They are liberals and so will not receive the political excommunication of the popes.
If they affirm LG 14 and 16 as being physically invisible cases and say that they accept Vatican Council II in harmony with the strict interpretation of EENS they could be politically excommunicated. The present two popes have accepted Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally.
There is no apology from the Jesuits for expelling Fr. Leonard Feeney from their community. The Jesuits today accept LG 14 and 16 as being physically visible examples of salvation outside the Church and so Lumen Gentium 14 and 16 are objective exceptions for EENS, as , EENS was interpreted by St. Ignatius of Loyola.
The Jesuits today also accept Vatican Council II being a break with Ignatian EENS since invisible cases of LG 14 and 16 are physically visible for them. If they were invisible then they could not be objective examples of salvation outside the Church and practical exceptions for EENS.
So we have a convoluted theology in the Church with what is physically invisible being mistaken as being visible examples of salvation outside the Church in the present times. This is the basis for the liberalism in faith and morals and is called 'the spirit of Vatican Council II'.
If the Franciscans of the Immaculate say physically invisible cases are invisible only they could be excommunicated for saying the obvious. There is a prohibition on saying what is invisible is only invisible. The popes follow this rule. Invisibile people are visibile?
Upholding the invisible people are visible confusion is the green pass for a Catholic to not be excommunicated. The St.Benedict Center in New Hampshire would not say this. So a Decree of Prohibitions has been issued against them. They interpret the baptism of desire (BOD) and invincible ignorance (II) like the saints Thomas Aquinas and Augustine- and not like the CDF.
Now with 'the reverse excommunication policy' the traditionalists and those who oppose the innovation in the Synods could be placed outside the Church. Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and Fr. Leonard Feeney were excommunicated for their orthodoxy.
There was a political and false excommunication of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and Fr.Leonard Feeney of Boston. The baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance always refers to physically invisible cases. So how could they be practical exceptions for Feeneyite EENS? -Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment