Cardinal Gianfranco Ghirlanda sj, Commissar of the Franciscans of the Immaculate and Cardinal Braz de Avez, Prefect of the Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life, want Fr. Stefano Manelli fi and the Franciscans of the Immaculate to accept Vatican Council II interpreted with the New Theology of Pope Pius XII.So then the conclusion will be a break with Tradition. They are dishonest.

 

Cardinal Gianfranco Ghirlanda sj, Commissar of the Franciscans of the Immaculate and Cardinal Braz de Avez Prefect of the Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life, want Fr. Stefano Manelli fi and the Franciscans of the Immaculate to accept Vatican Council II interpreted with the New Theology of Pope Pius XII.

So then the conclusion will be a break with Tradition.

But if the cardinals avoid the Irrational Premise and choose the Rational Premise then Vatican Council II will not be a break with Tradition. So they could affirm Tradition and Vatican Council II interpreted rationally.It is not either-or. They do not have to choose between the two.

The deceptive Irrational Premise should not be forced upon the Franciscans of the Immaculate and other religious communities. This is unethical. It is a dishonest way to produce a break with Tradition.

When the Council is interpreted with the Rational Premise then it is dogmatic and supports the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus with Ad Gentes 7.Lumen Gentium 8,14 and 16 being hypothetical and invisible are not objective exceptions for AG 7 and the dogma EENS. So the Council is not only pastoral, as said by Pope Paul VI, it is also dogmatic.

Pope Paul VI interpreted the Council with the New Theology of Pope Pius XII which was there in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston relative to Fr.Leonard Feeney.So the Council contradicted Feeneyite EENS.It was not dogmatic.

If Pope Paul VI had interpreted Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise in 1965 the Council would be dogmatic and religious liberty,collegiality and ecumenism would not be an issue.

Today we can still interpret the Council rationally and there will be no break with Tradition as held by the Franciscans of the Immaculate.The laity at the Synods could also be asked to interpret Vatican Council II rationally.-Lionel Andrades

NOVEMBER 25, 2022

So the Council interpreted rationally is not only pastoral but also dogmatic

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/11/so-council-interpreted-rationally-is.html

NOVEMBER 24, 2022

Pope Pius XII could be considered the founder of the New Theology. The 1949 Letter of the Holy Office indicates that there is known salvation outside the Church. So the traditional ecclesiocentrism of the Church was made obsolete. His Mystici Corporis was Cushingite with the Irrational Premise and not Feeneyite like the Council of Florence 1441.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/11/pope-pius-xii-could-be-considered.html