eucharistandmission: The sedevacantists WM Review, Novus Ordo Watch, MHT seminary, Tradcast, CMRI, MHFM support false doctrine on Vatican Council II which is a break with Tradition and so not Anti Semitic

Wednesday, November 30, 2022

The sedevacantists WM Review, Novus Ordo Watch, MHT seminary, Tradcast, CMRI, MHFM support false doctrine on Vatican Council II which is a break with Tradition and so not Anti Semitic

The sedevacantists WM Review cannot agree on a definition of a premise from the Internet. They also cannot decide if we can physically see a baptism of desire case in the present times. So they cannot say if Lumen Gentium 14 and 16 refer to a physically visible or invisible case in 2022.

The sedevacantists cannot answer this simple philosophical question.Can they physically see with their eyes non Catholics in 2022 saved with the baptism of desire or in invincible ignorance?

Of course the answer is NO.

So then how can LG 8,14,16 etc be visible examples of salvation outside the Church and practical exceptions for Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) for them? For me they are not practical exceptions for EENS. But for the sedevacantists Bishop Donald Sanborn and Bishop Pivarunas, LG 8,14,16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II are practical exceptions for the Syllabus of Errors, an Ecumenism of Return and EENS.

So if the WM Review understands what is a premise and that there is a rational and irrational premise in the interpretation of Lumen Gentium etc, then they would have to say, like me, that Vatican Council II does not contradict the past exclusivist ecclesiology. The sedevacantist bishops would have to affirm Feeneyite EENS and this would be Anti Semitic for the Jewish Left.The sedevacantists have property in Florida etc.

So the sedes support false doctrine which is a break with Tradition.-Lionel Andrades