The USCCB bishops use the common False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II to avoid the Anti Semitic charge. It is the same with the traditionalists and sedevacantists

The USCCB bishops use the common False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II.Is it legal ? In this way they are not Anti Semitic for the ADL. With the Rational Premise Vatican Council II would be in harmony with the past ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church.

So  now they project Lumen Gentium 8, Lumen Gentium 14, Lumen Gentium 16, Nostra Aetate 3, Gaudium et Specs 22 etc, in Vatican Council II as referring to a visible and not invisible case case in 1965-2022.

For me they are invisible and not physically visible in the present times.

So with this approach they create practical examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church. For me LG 8 etc refer to only speculative cases.

For them LG 8 etc are practical exceptions for extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the Athanasius Creed.For me hypothetical cases of the baptism of desire (LG 14) and invincible ignorance(LG 16) cannot be practical exceptions for the past ecclesiocentrism of the Church,the exclusivist ecclesiology of the Patristic Fathers and the Jesuit missionaries in the 16th century.

So they use a False Premise ( invisible non Catholics saved are visible) and I use the Rational Premise ( invisible non Catholics saved in the present times are invisible only).

So officially and publically the USCCB bishops are faking it.They do not want the Anti Semitic label of the Left.

NOT TEACHING THE CATHOLIC FAITH

They are cheating and not teaching Catholics the faith.

How can invisible people, who are presently in Heaven,be also visible on earth and be present at two places at the same time ? This contradicts the Principle of Non Contradiction.

How can the USCCB be trusted on other issues when they knowingly use a false form of reasoning ?

Otherwise it would seem that in principle, the USCCB gives the green light for cheating.

NO DENIAL FROM WORD ON FIRE AND USCCB

Bishop Robert Barron, even  after being informed continues to interpret Vatican Council II with 

1.a Fake Premise ( invisible people are visible),

2. Fake Inference ( they are examples of salvation outside the Church and practical exceptions for EENS, Syllabus of Errors, Athanasius Creed etc) 

3.and Non Traditional Conclusion ( Vatican Council II is a rupture with Tradition, the Syllabus of Errors has exceptions and so is obsolete etc).

Bishop Barron and Word on Fire do not deny what I have written here.They know it is dishonest. 

USCCB NEEDS EXCEPTIONS FOR EENS

For me Lumen Gentium 16 refers to an invisible case but for the USCCB bishops it is visible. For me, LG 16 (being saved in invincible ignorance) refers to a hypothetical case but for the American bishops it is not hypothetical. If it was hypothetical it would not contradict the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church.So they need the exceptions.

LG 16 is objective for them and subjective for me. LG 16 is always implicit and never explicit, for me. For them it is the reverse. Upon this irrationality they follow their new theology. The USCCB bishops at Baltimore decided to give the Eucharist to Biden to protect their interests.

USCCB BISHOPS ARE UNETHICAL : LIBERAL THEOLOGY IS POLITICAL

They are now choosing to interpret Vatican Council II with a Fake Premise, to protect their interests. Bishop Barron is doing this after being informed. It is unethical.

John Allen Jr’s podcasts are offered on Bishop Barron’s website. Bishop Barron and John Allen interpret Vatican Council II with a Fake Premise and so produce a liberal version of the Catholic faith.

They also support the liberal theology of the popes from Paul VI to Francis, who also created liberalism with the same Fake Premise. The USCCB officially does the same.-Lionel Andrades