If Pope Francis
admits that the 1949 Letter of the Holy
Office to the Archbishop of Boston (LOHO) made a mistake and that he now interprets
Vatican Council II with the rational premise and inference then he becomes a traditionalist.
Since the Council, without the LOHO reasoning, is no more liberal for him.
This is still not understood by the
traditionalists who must reject the error in the LOHO, re-interpret Vatican
Council II rationally and ask the College of Cardinals, to do the same. Then
the next popes will have to be conservative since the Council is conservative.
There cannot be a New Ecumenism since
there is no known salvation outside the Catholic Church in 2023.
There is no New Ecclesiology since
outside the Church there is no known salvation in 1965-2023.
There cannot be a New Evangelization
since the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus has not been contradicted by
Vatican Council II (LG 16 etc).
There cannot be a political
interpretation of Vatican Council II for the bishops since the Council is
Feeneyite. Ad Gentes 7 and Lumen Gentium 14 support Feeneyite EENS, while LG 8,
14 and 16, UR 3, NA 2 and GS 22 are not objective exceptions for AG 7 and EENS.
The Council is no more leftist for the
people, that is, those among them who discern.
There can be
a Vatican Council II which is rational or irrational, in harmony or a break
with Tradition, supporting 16th century EENS or rejecting it,
against the Syllabus of Errors or for it, changing the Athanasius Creed or supporting them as they were understood
over the centuries.-Lionel Andrades
No comments:
Post a Comment