The SSPX interprets Vatican Council II
irrationally and then rejects the non traditional conclusion. They reject the
liberalism of the Council.But the liberalism is a result and not the cause. The
cause is the Irrational Premise. They interpret the Council irrationally, with
the Irrational Premise( invisible cases are visible, LG 16 refers to a visible
case in 2023). The result is an Irrational Premise( LG 16 refers to a known non
Catholic saved outside the Church in invincible ignorance.So this is a
practical exception for the dogma extra ecclesiam
nulla salus). Then there has to follow a Non Traditional Conclusion ( LG 16
etc is a rupture with the dogma EENS, the Syllabus of Errors and the rest of
Tradition. The Council is 'a new revelation', 'a revolution' etc).
Here lies the fault. Here is the cause
of the liberalism, the break with Tradition. We have discovered the Missing
Link. So now we can always interpret Vatican Council II with the hermeneutic of
continuity with the Athanasius Creed, the Catechism of Pope Pius X etc. The
Council is no more an issue for conservative Catholics.
Traditionis Custode and the Synods
are valid and licit for Pope Francis but in a sense they are invalid since they
based upon an irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II.The pope has a
rational choice.
The FSSP Mass at the church Santissima
Trinita dei Pelligrini, Rome, for example, is valid and licit for Pope Francis
and the Rome Vicariate.But the priests and congregation are dishonestly interpreting
Vatican Council II. They have chosen the Irrational Premise and Inference
and Non Traditional Conclusion. I can interpret the Council with the traditional Rational
Premise and Inference, producing a Traditional Conclusion.
So for the FSSP and the SSPX there is a
break with Tradition which is politically approved by Pope Francis and the Left.
This is ideological. It is not Catholic.- Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment