In his latest Vortex on Vatican Council II Michael Voris has chosen to affirm Vatican Council II ( irrational) and so avoid a Decree of Prohibitions against CMTV : this heretical, schismatic and political

 

In his latest Vortex on Vatican Council II Michael Voris has avoided referring to Vatican Council II ( rational).Since if he accepts Vatican Council II ( rational), and not his present irrational interpretation, then he would have to affirm Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). When he affirms Vatican Council II( rational) and extra ecclesiam nulla salus (rational) the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, the Archbishop of Detroit and the Left will issue a Decree of Prohibitions against him. It will be a kind of excommunication.So he avoids it.

He chooses to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally.

He then criticizes the SSPX for rejecting Vatican Council II ( irrational).

It is easier for me to interpret Vatican Council II and EENS rationally since I do not own or manage, an expensive media center. It is difficult for Catholics like Roberto dei Mattei, Michael Matt and John Henry Weston. Even Archbishop Vigano does not want to be penalized by the Left and the Vatican. He will not affirm Vatican Council II rational and Feeneyite EENS.

Even the sedevacantist bishop Donald Sanborn, who is not under the Vatican, fears the Left as he builds a new seminary building. He will not affirm Vatican Council II ( rational).

After Michael Voris interviewed Brother Andre Marie micm, in New Hampshire, the flak came in.Then CMTV did a U-turn. CMTV posted an article by Jim Russel referring to The Strange Doctrines of Fr. Feeney. Russel used the common False Premise.CMTV did not want to support  Feeneyite EENS like Brother Andre Marie micm.

In this way Michael Voris avoided a Decree of Prohibitions.

Though his present interpretation of Vatican Council II is schismatic, heretical, unethical and a sin. It changes the interpretation of the Creeds and Catechisms too.- Lionel Andrades