Redemptoris Missio, Dominus Iesus and the other encyclicals and Apostolic Letters of the popes from Paul VI to Francis were issued with the irrational and not rational interpretation of Vatican Council II

Vatican Council II was called to implement the political victory of the liberals and Masons in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office (LOHO) to the Archbishop of Boston.They changed theology. It was over looked by Pope Pius XII and the popes who followed. Even Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre did not correct the mistake in the 1949 LOHO.

Without the LOHO error – confusing what is invisible as visible- there is no liberalism in the Church. There is no New Theology. The New Theology says outside the Church there is known salvation in the Church . Without the LOHO error there is no New Theology with  new doctrines. The Church will return to the old theology, the old ecclesiology.

Without the LOHO error  and Vatican Council II repeating the LOHO error, the Church returns to the past strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).There are no exceptions mentioned  for the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors etc.

But Cardinal Ratzinger accepted the LOHO and interpreted Vatican Council with LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, NA 2, GS 22 etc being exceptions for EENS. This was his liberal new theology. We can see its bad fruits today in the Synods

Sister Nathalie Bequart, a Consultant in the Synod says the Synod is based upon the new ecclesiology of Vatican Council II. She means the Council, interpreted with- and not without- the error of the 1949 LOHO error.

Redemptoris Missio, Dominus Iesus and the other encyclicals and Apostolic Letters of the popes from Paul VI to Francis were issued with the irrational and not rational interpretation of Vatican Council II..- Lionel Andrades