eucharistandmission: The Vatican and the Left will excommunicate/laicize/suspend any priest who affirms the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. So they do not allow Vatican Council II to be interpreted rationally. They want the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus to be rejected even though it is Biblical.

Sunday, February 12, 2023

The Vatican and the Left will excommunicate/laicize/suspend any priest who affirms the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. So they do not allow Vatican Council II to be interpreted rationally. They want the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus to be rejected even though it is Biblical.

The Vatican and the Left will excommunicate/laicize/suspend any priest who affirms the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. They do not allow Vatican Council II to be interpreted rationally. They want the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) to be rejected even though it is Biblical.

The Left and liberals say that a priest or religious sister, who affirms the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation, is really rejecting the exceptions for the dogma EENS, mentioned in Vatican Council II. It is a rejection of Vatican Council II and is schismatic etc. This is the argument of the liberals.

IN REALITY VATICAN COUNCIL II CANNOT HAVE ANY EXCEPTIONS FOR EENS.

But in reality LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, are not physically visible in the present times (2023).They are not known examples of salvation outside the Church. These are not public cases. We cannot meet or see someone saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16) or with the baptism of desire (LG 14).So there really are no exceptions. Hypothetical cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, do not contradict Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

LEGION OF CHRIST PRIEST RENEGES

I remember, none of the Legion of Christ priests in the philosophy and theology faculty of the university (UPRA) was willing to affirm the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS, when I was studying there in 2002.One of them did. He said it was the teaching of the Church. He said he would affirm it even though his colleagues would not do so. So I quoted him on this blog. He then reneged. He did not want to leave his teaching career with the Legion of Christ.He was afraid.

ROME VICARARIATE THREATHENS PRIESTS WHO AFFIRM EENS: NOW THE PROBLEM IS VATICAN COUNCIL II (RATIONAL)

There are many such cases in Rome. The priest denies the dogma ENS after being threathened by the Rome Vicariate or the Vatican.

The Rome Vicariate also suspended the missionary magazine Christ to the World/Christo al Mondo of the Franciscans of the Immaculate of Fr. Stefano Manelli fi,.It had a report saying the Church had not rejected the dogma EENS. It was still valid.

A diocescan priest who was living with the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate, when their seminary was still open, initially affirmed the strict interpretatin of EENS. But later denied it. He was afraid.

ST.JOHN BOSCO HELD THE STRICT INTERPRETATION OF EENS

A Salesian priest at the basilica of the Sacred Heart, in front of Termini, Rome, affirmed the strict interpretation of EENS like St.John Bosco. I quoted him on this blog. Then he seemed to have doubts after I quoted him on this blog.He was afraid.

A diocesan priest who offered the Latin Mass at the church San Giuseppe a Capo le Case, Rome, said that there are no known cases of anyone saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire.I quoted him on this blog.He then was not sure of himself.The community was visited by an Auxiliary Bishop of the Rome Vicariate who is now the Archbishop-Cardinal of Bologna.

DON PIETRO LEONE IS SAFE WHEN HE INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONALLY. NO PENALTIES, NO SUSPENSION.

So Don Pietro Leone continues to interpret Vatican Council II with the Irrational Premise and Inference, in his series on the web blog Rorate Caeili.

Sacred Heart Major Seminary
MICHAEL VORIS AND THE SACRED HEART MAJOR SEMINARY : NO SUSPENSIONS

Michael Voris and the faculty at the Sacred Heart Major Seminary, Detroit ( Fastiggi, Martin, Excheviera etc) continue to interpret Vatican Council II with the Fake Premise.No suspensions.

CARDINAL RAYMOND BURKE AND FR. JOHN ZUHLSDORF CONTINUE WITH THE 'APPROVED DECEPTION'.

Cardinal Raymond Burke and Fr. John Zuhlsdorf and Catholic apologists continued with 'the approved deception'.

SSPX PRIESTS LOOK AFTER THEIR CAREER, STATUS AND REPUTATION : BUT NOW VATICAN COUNCIL II IS THE ISSUE AND NOT EENS.

It is the same with the SSPX priests in Rome and Albano, Italy.They are all protecting their career, status and reputation. The principal issue now is Vatican Council II and not EENS.Vatican Council II must only be interpreted rationally.- Lionel Andrades