EWTN reports on Fr. Leonard Feeney, choose the Boston Heresy of Pope Pius XII and Cardinal Richard Cushing to interpret the baptism of desire and being saved in invincibile ignorance, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and Vatican Council II (LG 8,14,16 etc). Without the Boston Heresy, EWTN apologists and adminstration would have to support the strict interpretation of EENS. They would emerge as Feeneyites themselves.
The Boston Heresy emerges after invisible cases of the baptism of desire(BOD) and being saved in invincibile ignorance(I.I) are considered physically visible examples of known salvation in personal cases, in the present times. Then it is inferred that the dogma EENS has practical exceptions and is now obsolete. So it is concluded that Vatican Concia II is a break with Tradition and has made traditional ecclesiocentrism obsolete.Since outside the Church there is (known) salvation.This was the reasoning of the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston approved by the popes from Pius XII to Francis. All the cardinals accepted the irrationality of the 1949 LOHO and so does EWTN.
When the BOD and I.I are interpreted rationally, with the rational premise, inference and traditional conclusion, they are not practical exceptions for EENS.They do not contradict Feeneyite EENS.
But when they are interpreted irrationally, with the irrational premise, inference and non traditional conclusion, they are projected as practical exceptions for EENS. They contradict Feeneyite EENS.
When the rational premise is used ( and there is no other ethical choice), then the Boston Heresy refers to the heresy of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and the popes. They had confused what is invisible (LG 14, LG 16 ) as being visible and then made irrational conclusions, which were political.
So they approved the 1949 LOHO which says not every one needs to be a member of the Catholic Church for salvation, as if they knew of some particolar exception in 1949.It was as if they could see or meet someone saved outside the Catholic Church, without faith and the baptism of water.The dogma EENS defined by three Church Councils says the opposite i.e everyone needs to be a member of the Catholic Church for salvation.
It is with this Boston Heresy that EWTN has posted some reports on the Internet.
1.Letter to the Archbishop of Boston.
2.Leonard Feeney on 'no salvation outside the Church'.
3.Tragic Errors of Fr. Leonard Feeney.
In these three reports EWTN overlooks the Boston Heresy of Pope Pius XII and Cardinal Richard Cushing.
Without the Boston Heresy EWTN would have to support Fr. Leonard Feeney and interpret Vatican Council II, rationally.The Council would then support the interpretation of EENS according to Fr. Leanard Feeney.
EWTN does not choose to be honest. It has to be political and dishonest. So it does not support the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS and neither Vatican Council II interpreted rationally.
-Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment