EWTN admits that the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office(LOHO) was not published in the Acta Apostolicae Sedis EWTN is dishonest and political

 

Holy Office to Archbishop of Boston, condemning the teachings of Feeney: DS 3866: "Non enim privatis iudiciis explicanda dedit Salvator noster ea, quae in fidei deposito continentur, sed ecclesiastico magisterio."-"Our Savior did not hand over the things contained in the deposit of faith to private judgment to be explained, but to the magisterium of the Church."

COMMENT: A note on p. 230 of Sennott says this response was not published in the Acta Apostolicae Sedis. This is true, but it still was a decision of the Holy Office, whose translation was approved by Pope Pius XII. The part just cited is clear from basic theology

Fr.William Most ( EWTN),

https://www.ewtn.com/catholicism/library/leonard-feeney-on-no-salvation-outside-the-church-12315

 

Caption: Fr.Leonard Feeney with one of the four Catholic professors expelled by Jesuit Boston College, for not saying that invìsible cases of the baptism of desire etc were visible exceptions for traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).

 

EWTN admits that the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office(LOHO) was not published in the Acta Apostolicae Sedis.The LOHO was heretical, irrational and unethical. It says that not every one needs to be a member of the Catholic Church for salvation. It contradicts two Church Councils. It postulates invisible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance as being visible exceptions for 16^th century extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).Modernism?

Caption : Four teachers of Boston College were fired for not saying like the Americanist Jesuits that invisible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance were visible exceptions for EENS, as it was interpreted by St. Ignatius of Loyola and the founders of the Jesuit community.

The invisible-visible confusion of EWTN is unethical. It indicates that everyone does not need to enter the Church for salvation in the present times, is heretical. It contradicts a defined dogma. It suggests that  Vatican Council II ( irrational) is a break with traditional EENS. LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc are interpreted irrationally with the invisible-visible confusion. In this way it contradicts EENS as it was interpreted over the centuries. This is schism.

With the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II, the Creeds, Catechisms and Syllabus of Errors etc are changed. This is a rejection.Thier meaning is changed.

Exceptions are created for the past ecclesiocentrism of the Church, when in reality there are no known exceptions.EWTN is dishonest and political.

Therefore, that one may obtain eternal salvation, it is not always required that he be incorporated into the Church actually as a member, but it is necessary that at least he be united to her by desire and longing.- Letter of the Holy Office 1949

Not always required ? Why ? Who do we know who is an exception in 1949? What is the name of the person saved without faith and the baptism of water in the present times (1949-2023)? How can invisible cases be exceptions for the dogma EENS?

- Lionel Andrades

 MARCH 16, 2023

The Boston Heresy refers to the public heresy of the popes from Pius XII to Francis. The heresy has infected the whole Church like the Arian heresy of the past. All the cardinals and bishops accept the Boston Heresy of the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/03/those-boston-heresy-refers-to-public.html

MARCH 15, 2023

Wikipedia’s entries on Vatican Council II, extra ecclesiam nulla sales, Fr. Leonard Feeney, Feeneyism, etc reek with the Boston Heresy of the popes from Pius XII to Francis

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/03/wikipedias-entries-on-vatican-council.html

 MARCH 15, 2023

Pope Pius XII, Pope Paul VI and Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre did not seem to know this. This is now the heresy of the popes from Pius XII to Francis. This is the Boston Heresy. I call it Cushingism.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/03/pope-pius-xii-pope-paul-vi-and.html