Even sedevacantist bishops Donald Sanborn and Mark Pivarunas have to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and avoid the Anti Semitic charge. If they are not irrational, non traditional and heretical they will lose their tax exempt charity status.

 

Even sedevacantist bishops Donald Sanborn and Mark Pivarunas have to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and avoid the Anti Semitic charge. If they are not irrational, non traditional and heretical they will lose their tax exempt charity status.

So they are choosing to interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, in Vatican Council II, irrationally. Invisible cases are assumed to be visible, implicit mistaken as being explicit.So there are fake exceptions for the dogma EENS. With this ruse they also make the Athanasius Creed obsolete.

 They need the rupture with Tradition for financial survival. I have mentioned this before a few times, and have even e-mailed them.

They need to say that hypothetical and invisible cases of the LG 8, 14 and 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, are not objective exceptions for the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) on extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).This Council did not mention any exceptions. But if they speak the truth they are in trouble financially.So they interpret Vatican Council II like the present liberal popes.

Even the sedevacantists Peter and Michael Dimond need to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally.-Lionel Andrades