If the Most Holy Family Monastery of Peter and Michael Dimond interpreted Vatican Council II rationally then they would be affirming Feeneyite EENS and would be Anti Semitic for the Left. They could lose their charity status.

 

The Most Holy Family Monastery was initially incorporated in 1993 as the Queen of Angels Corp, it is a New York Domestic Not-For-Profit Corporation under the business type "religious organization" says Wikipedia.

They affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) according to the Fourth Lateran Council (1215). However they interpret Vatican Council II irrationally. So they contradict the 1215 Council and are politically correct. They interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as being physically visible cases in the present times. So they become ‘objective exceptions ‘for the dogma EENS. Like the SSPX they are saying that the dogma EENS has exceptions.

They reject the baptism of desire since they assume it is a visible and known case outside the Church and so would be an exception for EENS which has no exceptions.

They have always affirmed Feeneyite EENS but have also always interpreted Vatican Council II, irrationally, as if it is a rupture with EENS. They make the same visible-invisible confusion as the main line Church.

With the common interpretation of Vatican Council II, irrationally, they reject the dogma EENS and are not labeled Anti Semitic and remain a charitable organization.

If they interpreted Vatican Council II rationally then they would be affirming Feeneyite EENS and would be Anti Semitic for the Left. They could lose their charity status.

They are a 'religious organisation' which interprets Vatican Council II politically and unethically.-Lionel Andrades

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Most_Holy_Family_Monastery