The SSPX denies the faith by projecting LG 8, 14 and 16, UR 3 etc as not being invisible but visible people saved outside the Church. This is political and convenient

 

ANGLICAN RECOLLECT PRIEST AFFIRMS THE CATHOLIC FAITH

An Anglican Recollect priest at the church Sant Ildefonso e Tomasso Villanova, in Rome recently said that he accepts Vatican Council II and it has the hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition for him. So for him outside the Church there is no salvation (AG 7, LG 14, CCC 845,846 etc). Also the three youth with whom I spoke before the SSPX Mass yesterday morning also said that they affirm the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation. They accepted it. But the confusion for them, I noticed, as it is for the main line Novus Ordo church, here is on LG 8, 14 and 16. Are they visible or invisible cases? The answer determines if the theology is old or new.

CATHOLIC YOUTH AT SSPX PALM SUNDAY MASS AFFIRM EENS

These Catholic youth now know that LG 8 etc are invisible cases. For the first time in their life somebody told them about it and it was not at the Latin Mass. They are also invisible cases for the Augustinian Recollect priest and they do not talk about it at Mass in Italian. Yes they are invisible people say.Everyone agrees with me. They they say and that this is something obvious. They can only be invisible cases.

VATICAN COUNCIL II AND THE CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH SHOULD NOT BE A BREAK WITH TRADITION FOR THE SSPX YOUTH

So for the SSPX youth the Catechism of the Catholic Church and Vatican Council II should not be a break with Tradition. For every priest, bishop, cardinal and pope  LG 8, 14 and 16 should not be a break with the dogma EENS and the Athanasius Creed. Since LG 8 etc can only be invisible in our reality. This is a given. There is no other choice. Only God can see someone saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) or the baptism of desire(BOD), or in imperfect communion with the Church (UR 3), or outside the Church where salvation subsists (LG 8), or where and when, God is not limited to the Sacraments (CCC1257).

POPE BENEDICT CHOSE IRRATIONALITY AND SAID THERE WAS A HERMENEUTIC OF CONTINUITY WITH TRADITION.

But there is confusion in the Catholic Church. Even Pope Benedict said Vatican Council II has the hermeneutic of continuity with the past. He meant that the Council interpreted irrationally, with the false premise, was in harmony with the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston, which also interprets the BOD and I.I irrationally.

So there was a rupture for Pope Benedict, with the dogma ENS according to Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston and the St. Benedict Center of his time. Pope Benedict would say that EENS today after Vatican Council II is no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16^th century. For him there was a rupture with the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) of Pope Honorius III and St.Dominc Guzman. 

For Pope Benedict, with the false premise and inference in the interpretation of Vatican Council II there was also a rupture with the Council of Florence (1442).It defined the dogma EENS without mentioning BOD and I.I as being exceptions.

So the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican today interprets Vatican Council II irrationally as it did in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office (LOHO) which it issued during the time of Pope Pius XII.

YOUTH AFFIRM EENS BUT NEGATE IT WITH VATICAN COUNCIL II

The SSPX also interprets Vatican Council II irrationally like the popes from Paul VI to Francis. They interpret EENS irrationally like the popes from Pius XII to Francis. So the three youth would be affirming traditional EENS according to the old Councils and Catechisms but would be negating it with the SSPX interpretation of Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church.

NON CHRISTIAN LAITY IMPORTANT

The SSPX priest understood what was happening yesterday morning when I was speaking to the three youth. He said he would not speak to me. He told the youth not to speak to me. If they affirmed EENS with no exceptions, as they did, but also in harmony with Vatican Council II’s invisible cases, the non Catholic police in Rome would object and so would the non Catholic laity.

So the SSPX denies the faith by projecting LG 8, 14 and 16, UR 3 etc as not being invisible but visible people saved outside the Church.This is political and convenient.- Lionel Andrades