When Pope Francis and the cardinals and bishops mention Vatican Council II they refer to Vatican Council II irrational. It has to be rejected.We also have to keep this in mind.

 

When Pope Francis and the cardinals and bishops mention Vatican Council II they refer to Vatican Council II irrational. It has to be rejected.We also have to keep this in mind. For them LG 8, 14 and 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to visible people. Objective cases, seen in the flesh. They are for them, non Catholics saved without faith and the baptism of water in 1965-2023.This is false. There are no such cases in our reality. We cannot see or meet any such person who would be dead and now in Heaven. So what is invisible is wrongly being confused as being visible, implicit as being explicit, subjective as being objective. A New Theology is produced with this irrationality which says outside the Catholic Church there is known salvation.

But there is a silver lining. Today there are also Catholics who interpret Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church rationally. LG 8,14and 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to invisible and hypothetical cases only for them. They are only theoretical and speculative. So they are not practical exceptions for the centuries-old ecclesiocentrism, like that of the Dominicans and Jesuits from the 12^th to 16^th century.