At the Ministry of
Interior, Italy they interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and unethically.
Of course, they are following Pope Francis and the cardinals and bishops. But
Pope Francis can choose to interpret the Council rationally and honestly. Then
they too would have to do the same. So their present interpretation of Vatican
Council II is not something permanent.
They need to appeal to Pope
Francis to correct the error. An announcement on this issue is needed from the
Vatican.
Even the Federal Ministry
of Education, Italy, allows students to learn error on Vatican Council II. The
teaching faculties at the secular and pontifical universities in Italy
interpret Vatican Council II with the fake premise and inference to produce a
false non traditional conclusion. This is academically unethical.
Cardinal Pietro Parolin,
the Vatican Secretary of State, must inform the Italian Foreign Ministry and
the Vatican embassies, to interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc
in Vatican Council II, as being only hypothetical and non objective cases in 1965-2023.
This is common sense. LG 8
etc are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church. We cannot meet
or see someone saved outside the Church. The person would be in Heaven if he or
she is saved.
When the Italian Ministry
of Interior interprets Vatican Council II rationally, then Catholics and non
Catholics, employed by them will have to do the same. Doctrine and theology for
Catholics will be consistent. There will be no liberal-traditionalist division
any more. - Lionel Andrades
FEBRUARY 16, 2023
The Italian Ministry of Interior and the CEI need to officially correct their position on Vatican Council II.
The cardinals and bishops of the Italian Bishops Conference (CEI) should be conservative and traditional only and should be opposing the Left. Since Vatican Council II is not liberal when LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to hypothetical cases only in 2023.They do not contradict the past ecclesiocentrism of the Church.
But today the Italian Interior Ministry is interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally like the CEI.The Ministry approves books being sold with Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally. This is deceptive. Also Propaganda Fide only gives stipends for students who interpret the Council irrationally. This is not Catholic.
The Italian Ministry of Interior and the CEI need to officially correct their position on Vatican Council II. - Lionel Andrades
FEBRUARY 16, 2023
The Catholic Bishops Conference in Italy (CEI) and Propaganda Fide discriminate against students who do not interpret Vatican Council II (LG 8 etc) irrationally.
FEBRUARY 16, 2023
At the pontifical Beda College, an English Catholic seminary in Rome, they discriminate against seminarians who interpret Vatican Council II ( LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc),rationally in harmony with Tradition.
FEBRUARY 15, 2023
The cardinals and bishops of the Italian Bishops Conference (CEI), are unethical. They are dishonest with their political interpretation of Vatican Council II. Since, there can be two interpretations of the Council. One is rational and the other is irrational.They choose the irrational version since it is supported by the Left :The CEI policy on Vatican Council II is dishonest
MARCH 6, 2023
It is important for the Italian Ministry of Interior and that of External Affairs to coordinate with the Vatican Secretary of State and confirm that Vatican Council II is only to be interpreted rationally and honestly
JANUARY 30, 2023
It is important for the Italian Ministry of Interior and that of External Affairs to coordinate with the Vatican Secretary of State and confirm that Vatican Council II is only to be interpreted rationally and honestly
It is important for the Italian Ministry of Interior and that of External Affairs to coordinate with the Vatican Secretary of State and confirm that Vatican Council II is only to be interpreted rationally and honestly i.e Lumen Gentium 8, Lumen Gentium 14, Lumen Gentium 16,Unitatis Redintigratio 3,Nostra Aetate 2, Gaudium et Specs 22 etc in the Council-text refers to only hypothetical and invisible cases in 2023. They also need to inform all non Christian organizations to only interpret Vatican Council II honestly.-Lionel Andrades
JANUARY 29, 2023
JANUARY 29, 2023
Modello A e Modello B - Concilio Vaticano II
JANUARY 23, 2023
The Proof
JANUARY 30, 2023
Lettera del Sant'Uffizio 1949 di cardinale Francesco Marchetti Selvaggiani con commenti (Repost)
JANUARY 30, 2023
Leggere la Letterra del Sant' Ufficio del 1949 con l'approccio Feeneyismo e Cushingismo o I passaggi rossi non sono eccezioni ai passaggi blu o I passaggi in rosso sono eccezioni ai passaggi in blu ( Repost)
JANUARY 30, 2023
E se non ci sono casi oggettivi come ci può essere un'eccezione?
JANUARY 29, 2023
Before the next Conclave of Cardinals to elect a pope the Vatican Tribunal must clarify that only those cardinals will be allowed to vote, who interpret Vatican Council II rationally, in harmony with Tradition. This is ethical and Catholic.
AUGUST 5, 2019
Then would you say that Fr. Leonard Feeney was correct and the Holy Office 1949 was wrong in the Letter of the Holy Office (LOHO), since LOHO assumed BOD, BOB and I.I were exceptions to Feeneyite EENS and criticized Fr. Leonard Feeney and the St.Benedict Center in the text of the Letter?https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/08/then-would-you-say-that-fr-leonard.html
MARCH 24, 2018
Bishop Fellay no more has to reject Vatican Council II and the popes since John XXIII : the Council is traditional without the LOHO reasoning
DECEMBER 28, 2018
Letter of the Holy Office 1949 which has an irrational premise and inference and contradicts the Principle of Non Contradiction is referenced in Vatican Council II, Lumen Gentium 16 : Warren Goddard observes
MARCH 21, 2018
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment