Cardinal Sean O Malley and the bishops in Boston and New England must be asked to interpret Vatican Council II only rationally and so affirm Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and have it taught in the schools, adult catechesis etc. The bishop of Manchester and Worcester can no more interpret Vatican Council II deceptively in public. They must affirm the strict interpretation of EENS of the St. Benedict Center in their diocese.

Cardinal Sean O Malley and the bishops in Boston and New England must be asked to interpret Vatican Council II only rationally and so affirm Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and have it taught in the schools, adult catechesis etc. The bishop of Manchester and Worcester, suffragen dioceses of Boston,  can no more interpret Vatican Council II deceptively in public. They must affirm the strict interpretation of EENS of the St. Benedict Center in their diocese.

The Decree of Prohibitions issued against the St. Benedict Center in the diocese of Manchester in New Hampshire, must also apply to the bishop and Curia, in Manchester, once they interpret Vatican Council II rationally. For then they would be affirming Feeneyite EENS or EENS according to the Councils which defined EENS in the 13th and 15th century.

Catholic schools in the diocese of Manchester in New Hampshire, USA have still not switched to Vatican Council II ( rational) which is in harmony with the dogma EENS according to Fr. Leonard Feeney and the St. Benedict Center in Boston. 

There are no exceptions for EENS in the text of Vatican Council II when the Council is interpreted rationally i.e. LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to only hypothetical cases. They are theoretical and exist only in our mind. They are not objective non Catholics. They are not known people saved without Catholic faith and the baptism of water. So LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc are not exceptions for the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) on EENS. There are no visible cases in 1965-2023.

Catholics students in Manchester should be taught that outside the Church there is no salvation. This is the teaching of Vatican Council II (LG 14, AG 7) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church (845,846 etc). 

Also religious communities  in Manchester should be free to affirm Vatican Council II and the Catechisms in harmony with the Council of Florence (1442) and the Fourth Lateran Council (1215).

The Catholics Church's teachings in Manchester is being questioned  since Magisterial Documents ( Creeds, Catechisms ) including Vatican Council II are being interpreted irrationally and politically. This is unethical. This is not the Catholic Faith. Liberalism cannot be produced by re-intepreting what is invisible(LG 8 etc) as being physically visible examples of non Catholics saved outside the Church in the present times (1965-2023).

In New Hampshire, Bishop Peter Libasci, the bishop of Manchester, held a religious program in the church for the police some time back.He did not tell them to interpret Vatican Council II rationally and honestly - and so in harmony with the centuries old understanding of EENS. EENS today is the same as it was for the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century. -Lionel Andrades

MAY 18, 2023

Cardinal Sean O’Malley and all the auxiliary bishops in Boston would be Feeneyite on extra ecclesiam nulla salus if they did not interpret Vatican Council II irrationally

 

Cardinal Sean O’Malley and all the auxiliary bishops in Boston would be Feeneyite on extra ecclesiam nulla salus if they did not interpret Vatican Council II irrationally. For it is by interpreting LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as being invisible people in 2023 that exceptions are produced for Feeneyite EENS. Invisible cases must not be visible examples of salvation outside the Church. But we know that LG 8 etc can only be visible for us human beings. So they are never practical exceptions for EENS. The 1949 Letter of the Holy Office made a mistake in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case. The 1949 Letter to the Archbishop of Boston confused invisible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invisible ignorance, as being visible exceptions for EENS according to the Fourth Lateran Council( 1215) and the Council of Florence (1442).This was an objective error.

So at all Catholic schools in Boston, Catholics should be taught to interpret Vatican Council II rationally and affirm Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

In the pews in Boston, Catholics are not united on the Creeds. Since with the irrational and rational interpretation of Vatican Council II there are two interpretations of the Nicene Creed, two interpretations of the Athanasius Creed etc.- Lionel Andrades

 MAY 17, 2023

Bishop Peter Libasci the bishop of Manchester in New Hampshire, USA and his Curia are avoiding a Decree of Prohibitions being issued against them by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican. They do this by interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/05/bishop-peter-libasci-bishop-of.html