Michael Voris is not telling viewers that Vatican Council II can be interpreted rationally and then the Council will be in harmony with the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) :The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith is Cushingite and political on this issue and so not Magisterial

 

Michael Voris is not telling viewers that Vatican Council II can be interpreted rationally and then the Council will be in harmony with the Fourth Lateran Council (1215), which he does not support for political reasons. He does not want to be labeled a Feeneyite.It would be Anti Semitic for the Jewish Left.

So he leaves Catholics in the dark, uninformed. He looks after his liberal reputation and the financial position of Church Militant TV. In the Vortex, 'lies and truths' are no more captured on this issue, since it could be expensive. Neither can he criticize the US bishops or the SSPX for not interpreting Vatican Council II rationally instead of irrationally, since then he would have to do the same.

CDF WAS NOT MAGISTERIAL IN THE 1949 LETTER

Michael Voris says that he follows the Magisterium of the Church and so also the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican. 

1. But the CDF was Cushingite in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office (CDF) to the Archbishop of Boston. The CDF chose the irrational premise to interpret the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance. This is was unethical and not Catholic. It was political.

2.The CDF was also Cushingite at Vatican Council II (1965). It interpreted invisible cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, as being visible exceptions for the dogma EENS according to the Fourth Lateran Council.

This Council says all need to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation and the CDF, in the 1949 Letter says not everyone needs to enter the Church for salvation, as if there are personally known exceptions for them in the present times.

Even today the CDF projects Vatican Council II as a rupture with the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors. This is an objective mistake in public and cannot be Magisterial. This is political and not Catholic.

 The CDF was also not Magisterial on this issue during the pontificate of Pope Benedict. As Prefect of the CDF, Pope Benedict rejected the Athanasius Creed, Syllabus of Errors and 16^th century EENS of the missionaries. They were rejected in the name of Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally.

The rational interpretation of Vatican Council II would not be appreciated or tolerated by the Mosaad, the Pasdaran and the equivalent organization in Saudi Arabia.

So Michael Voris and the CDF choose to interpret Vatican Council II deceptively and politically and they wrongly call it the magisterium.-Lionel Andrades

MAY 20, 2023

 

Sedevacantism is not the solution

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/05/sedevacantism-is-not-solution_20.html

MAY 19, 2023

There is also the fourth possibility, the orthodox one. Pope Francis is the pope but because of mortal sins, un-confessed and because of scandals not rectified, he is not in communion with Jesus and the Church. He lacks Sanctifying Grace and is outside the Church.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/05/there-is-also-fourth-possibility.html