The CDF was Cushingite in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office (CDF) to the Archbishop of Boston and Cushingite at Vatican Council II (1965). Even today the CDF projects Vatican Council II as a rupture with the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors. They have a rational and traditional option

 1. But the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) was Cushingite in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office (CDF) to the Archbishop of Boston. The CDF chose the irrational premise to interpret the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance. This is was unethical and not Catholic. It was political.

2.The CDF was also Cushingite at Vatican Council II (1965). It interpreted invisible cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, as being visible exceptions for the dogma EENS according to the Fourth Lateran Council.

This Council says all need to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation and the CDF, in the 1949 Letter says not everyone needs to enter the Church for salvation, as if there are personally known exceptions for them in the present times.

3.Even today the CDF projects Vatican Council II as a rupture with the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors. This is an objective mistake in public and cannot be Magisterial. This is political and not Catholic.

 The CDF was also not Magisterial on this issue during the pontificate of Pope Benedict. As Prefect of the CDF, Pope Benedict rejected the Athanasius Creed, Syllabus of Errors and 16^th century EENS of the missionaries. They were rejected in the name of Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally. -Lionel Andrades