Do you want a doctorate in theology and philosophy from the Angelicum, Anthonianum and La Sapienza University in Rome? It’s easy. You only have to interpret the Catholic Creeds, Catechisms, and Vatican Council II etc irrationally and dishonestly for political reasons.This is a condition.
The theology and philosophy faculty of the Regina Apostolorum University in Rome (UPRA) for example, have been doing this for years. It is public. You can check it out with any professor.This is approved by the Left and the Masons for the Catholic Church.
SSPX PRIESTS RECEIVE SAME EDUCATION
Tomorrow at
the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) chapel in Rome and Albano, Italy, they will
interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and sermons will be given, without
interpreting Vatican Council II rationally. The SSPX priest has also received
an academic degree in theology and philosophy from an SSPX-approved institution
which interprets the Council by confusing what is invisible as being visible
and then producing a New Theology, which they reject in public.
They chose
the False Premise in public to create a New Theology. Then in public they
reject the New Theology. They do not interpret the Council rationally, in
public. Instead the priests tell the faithful to not interpret the Council
rationally.
It is the
same in the main line Church and the pontifical educational institutions
approved by the Vatican Congregation for Education and the Italian Ministry of
Education. According to the SSPX District Superior, Italy their seminarians are sent to study at the pontifical universities in Rome. -Lionel Andrades
FEBRUARY 27, 2023
SSPX priest is unethical on Vatican Council II
FEBRUARY 26, 2023
Il sacerdote della FSSPX afferma il dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus secondo i vecchi Concili e Catechismi della Chiesa ma non il Concilio Vaticano II e il Catechismo della Chiesa Cattolica
FEBRUARY 27, 2023
If the SSPX interprets Vatican Council II rationally their image changes
APRIL 4, 2023
This is an impediment to offering Holy Mass in Latin. How is he allowed to offer Mass in Rome or Albano ?This is a scandal. He needs to correct the error in public before offering Holy Mass and the Sacraments.
The SSPX priest in Rome Fr. Federico Montani, like Sister Nathalie Bequart Consultant on the Synod, interprets Vatican Council II with a Fake Premise and Inference to produce a rupture with Tradition; the Creeds, Catechisms, Syllabus of Errors and dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
This is an impediment to offering Holy Mass in Latin. How is he allowed to offer Mass in Rome or Albano ?This is a scandal. He needs to correct the error in public before offering Holy Mass and the Sacraments.
He is a good person otherwise and a good preacher. I like his sermons.He though, is following the policy of the SSPX Headquarters on this issue.-Lionel Andrades
The SSPX priest in Rome Fr. Federico Montani, like Sister Nathalie Bequart Consultant on the Synod, interprets Vatican Council II with a Fake Premise and Inference to produce a rupture with Tradition; the Creeds, Catechisms, Syllabus of Errors and dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
This is an impediment to offering Holy Mass in Latin. How is he allowed to offer Mass in Rome or Albano ?This is a scandal. He needs to correct the error in public before offering Holy Mass and the Sacraments.
He is a good person otherwise and a good preacher. I like his sermons.He though, is following the policy of the SSPX Headquarters on this issue.-Lionel Andrades
APRIL 3, 2023
SSPX priest in Rome denies the Faith before non Christians
Another week and he will not answer. I asked him the same question. He is afraid. He knows what I am saying and he knows that he must not answer. It’s tough for the both of us. We know what the stakes are. It makes no difference for me in the sense I have past the point of no return but not him. He knows the implications and the sacrifices he has to make our big. So he wants to avoid it. He does not want to talk about it. It is something too sensitive. He agrees with me and we are on the same wavelength but he does not want to make his position known. He wants to be prudent like just about everyone else.
The priest who offered the Palm Sunday Mass at the SSPX chapel in Rome yesterday morning avoided me again before the Mass and he was cautioning everyone else not to talk to me.
Why? Since the subject is extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Leftist police, non Christians, are targeting Catholics, especially missionaries and those interested in evengelisation with traditional Catholic doctrine supported by Vatican Council II which is ecclesiocentric and missionary.
Fr. Federico Montani the SSPX priest who offered the Mass would not answer if Lumen Gentium 8, 14 and 16 etc, in Vatican Council II referred to invisible cases only in 2023.Since if they referred to visible cases for him, then he was really telling the non Christian police in Rome, that he does not affirm the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) and the Council of Florence (1442) which defined extra ecclesiam nulla salus and did not mention any exceptions. When LG 8 etc are explicit then this is liberalism. It is the public heresy of popes from Paul VI to Francis, in their rejection of the rational interpretation of Vatican Council II.
It is well known that for the SSPX bishops Vatican Council II is a rupture with Tradition. For years Fr. Montani has been teaching this and it was part of his religious formation with the SSPX. So they infer that LG 8 etc refer to visible cases. Invisible people cannot be objective examples of salvation outside the Church in the present times and so practical exceptions for the Council of Florence etc.
So Fr. Montani and the SSPX really reject the dogma EENS according to the Fourth Lateran Council and this sits well with the local police. There are visible exceptions for EENS is the political position of the SSPX and the liberals.
The SSPX priest is telling the police, which monitor the chapel and other churches here that he is not Anti Semitic, racists and other control-labels of the Left. His interpretation of Vatican Council II is not continuity with Tradition.
This is a denial of the Catholic Faith. By projecting LG 8 etc as being physically visible cases in the present times. The SSPX priests at Albano, Italy, are changing the interpretation of the Nicene Creed and the Apostles Creed and rejecting the Athanasius Creed. The Catechisms of Trent and Pius X which affirm the dogma EENS are made obsolete. This is bringing the liberal division into the Catholic Church.
I go for the SSPX Mass but I do not interpret Vatican Council II like Bishop Bernard Fellay and Fr. Davide Pagliarani whom Fr. Federico Montani follows.
The irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II, the Creeds and Catechisms was a mistake of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, Fr. Franz Schmidberger, Fr. Nicklaus Pfluger, Roberto dei Mattei, the Hildebrands, Fr. Nicholas Gruner, John Vennari, Christopher Ferrara and many others.
YOUNG PEOPLE AT THE SSPX MASS AGREE WITH ME
Yesterday morning I spoke to three young men before the Mass. They agreed with me. There are no invisible cases of a non Catholic saved in invincible ignorance or the baptism of desire. If anyone was saved as such they would only be known to God. I showed them a page which listed LG 8, 14 and 16 etc as being ‘Invisible Cases’. I also showed them a page in color which listed Ad Gentes 7, Lumen Gentium 14, the Catechism of the Catholic Church 845,846 etc supporting 'Exclusive Salvation in the Catholic Church'.
The page which listed invisible cases does not contradict the page with citations showing the Church still today teaches that there is exclusive salvation and this is mentioned in Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church.
These young men attend the SSPX Mass in Albano Lazio where the local bishop is Vincenzo Viva and the emeritus bishop is Cardinal Marcello Semeraro. They both interpret Vatican Council II as a break with Tradition by choosing the irrational premise. The liberals and traditionalists have something in common at Albano. -Lionel Andrades
SSPX priest in Rome denies the Faith before non Christians
Another week and he will not answer. I asked him the same question. He is afraid. He knows what I am saying and he knows that he must not answer. It’s tough for the both of us. We know what the stakes are. It makes no difference for me in the sense I have past the point of no return but not him. He knows the implications and the sacrifices he has to make our big. So he wants to avoid it. He does not want to talk about it. It is something too sensitive. He agrees with me and we are on the same wavelength but he does not want to make his position known. He wants to be prudent like just about everyone else.
The priest who offered the Palm Sunday Mass at the SSPX chapel in Rome yesterday morning avoided me again before the Mass and he was cautioning everyone else not to talk to me.
Why? Since the subject is extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Leftist police, non Christians, are targeting Catholics, especially missionaries and those interested in evengelisation with traditional Catholic doctrine supported by Vatican Council II which is ecclesiocentric and missionary.
Fr. Federico Montani the SSPX priest who offered the Mass would not answer if Lumen Gentium 8, 14 and 16 etc, in Vatican Council II referred to invisible cases only in 2023.Since if they referred to visible cases for him, then he was really telling the non Christian police in Rome, that he does not affirm the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) and the Council of Florence (1442) which defined extra ecclesiam nulla salus and did not mention any exceptions. When LG 8 etc are explicit then this is liberalism. It is the public heresy of popes from Paul VI to Francis, in their rejection of the rational interpretation of Vatican Council II.
It is well known that for the SSPX bishops Vatican Council II is a rupture with Tradition. For years Fr. Montani has been teaching this and it was part of his religious formation with the SSPX. So they infer that LG 8 etc refer to visible cases. Invisible people cannot be objective examples of salvation outside the Church in the present times and so practical exceptions for the Council of Florence etc.
So Fr. Montani and the SSPX really reject the dogma EENS according to the Fourth Lateran Council and this sits well with the local police. There are visible exceptions for EENS is the political position of the SSPX and the liberals.
The SSPX priest is telling the police, which monitor the chapel and other churches here that he is not Anti Semitic, racists and other control-labels of the Left. His interpretation of Vatican Council II is not continuity with Tradition.
This is a denial of the Catholic Faith. By projecting LG 8 etc as being physically visible cases in the present times. The SSPX priests at Albano, Italy, are changing the interpretation of the Nicene Creed and the Apostles Creed and rejecting the Athanasius Creed. The Catechisms of Trent and Pius X which affirm the dogma EENS are made obsolete. This is bringing the liberal division into the Catholic Church.
I go for the SSPX Mass but I do not interpret Vatican Council II like Bishop Bernard Fellay and Fr. Davide Pagliarani whom Fr. Federico Montani follows.
The irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II, the Creeds and Catechisms was a mistake of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, Fr. Franz Schmidberger, Fr. Nicklaus Pfluger, Roberto dei Mattei, the Hildebrands, Fr. Nicholas Gruner, John Vennari, Christopher Ferrara and many others.
YOUNG PEOPLE AT THE SSPX MASS AGREE WITH ME
Yesterday morning I spoke to three young men before the Mass. They agreed with me. There are no invisible cases of a non Catholic saved in invincible ignorance or the baptism of desire. If anyone was saved as such they would only be known to God. I showed them a page which listed LG 8, 14 and 16 etc as being ‘Invisible Cases’. I also showed them a page in color which listed Ad Gentes 7, Lumen Gentium 14, the Catechism of the Catholic Church 845,846 etc supporting 'Exclusive Salvation in the Catholic Church'.
The page which listed invisible cases does not contradict the page with citations showing the Church still today teaches that there is exclusive salvation and this is mentioned in Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church.
These young men attend the SSPX Mass in Albano Lazio where the local bishop is Vincenzo Viva and the emeritus bishop is Cardinal Marcello Semeraro. They both interpret Vatican Council II as a break with Tradition by choosing the irrational premise. The liberals and traditionalists have something in common at Albano. -Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment