How can a pope be an apostolic pope who interprets Vatican Council II, the Nicene Creed, Athanasius Creed, Catechism of the Catholic Church etc irrationally and not rationally? How can there be a pope who approves the two interpretations of the Creeds, Councils, and Catechisms etc-one is rational and the other is irrational? He has to interpret Church Documents rationally. This is common sense.

 

How can a pope be an apostolic pope who interprets Vatican Council II, the Nicene Creed, Athanasius Creed, Catechism of the Catholic Church etc irrationally and not rationally? How can there be a pope who approves the two interpretations of the Creeds, Councils, and Catechisms etc-one is rational and the other is irrational? He has to interpret Church Documents rationally. This is common sense.

How can we have a Prefect of the Dicastery of Doctrine and the Faith (DDF), Vatican, who does the same? The CDF/DDF also interprets Vatican Council II, the Creeds, Catechism of the Catholic Church and etc irrationally to produce a false break with Tradition. This is official heresy and schism. It cannot be magisterial or apostolic. 

There is no clarification or correction from Archbishop Augustine di Noia op, Secretary of the DDF.

Why is there a political Decree of Prohibitions issued against the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary at the St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire, USA when they accept Vatican Council and the Catechism of the Catholic Church. They interpret CCC 847-848 (invincible ignorance etc) rationally. It is the DDF which must interpret CCC 847-848 rationally and affirm that outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation (AG 7, LG 14, CCC 845,846 etc).This error with the St.Benedict Center was approved by Archbishop Augustine di Noia op.

- Lionel Andrades

JULY 28, 2023

Things have changed in the Church. You can know more tell me that you justify your liberalism with Vatican Council, since I can justify my orthodoxy, also with Vatican Council II

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/07/things-have-changed-in-church-you-can.html

TALKS ON VATICAN COUNCIL II BEING IN HARMONY WITH TRADITION AND THERE BEING TWO INTERPRETATIONS OF THE COUNCIL, ONE IS RATIONAL AND THE OTHER IS IRRATIONAL.

If you are a group of Catholics, liberal or traditionalist, I am willing to speak about this subject. I can present the material on this blog in an orderly way for you to understand quickly what I keep writing about. I available am in Rome ( only Rome) and there is no charge. The information will be given free. It will be illustrated with some graphics and photos.

I am a Catholic and I affirm the teachings of the Catholic Church as I have said often on this blog.

The difference between me and Catholics in general and also the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican,  is that they interpret Vatican Council II, the Creeds, Catechisms, Councils etc  irrationally and I am rational.

I choose a rational premise and inference and so my conclusion is traditional.

The presentation could take 20 minutes or less.I will be available to answer questions.I do not have any new theology to offer. I simply avoid an irrational observation and we return to the old theology of the Magisterium and missionaries of the 16th century at the Latin Mass. This would be the general theology today, which is honest and rational, at every Mass and every Rite. It would have to be the lex orandi.

Please e-mail me at : lionelandrades10@gmail.com

p.s I do not have a telephone contact number and do not travel out of Rome.

ONLY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH      SOLAMENTE LA CHIESA CATTOLICA

Lionel Andrades

Catholic lay man in Rome. Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.How can the Holy Spirit make an objective mistake ? So it is human error and not the Magisterium.

 Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral.

It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms. There can be two interpretations.Catholics must choose the rational option.

Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, nontraditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional?

It is unethical when the popes, cardinals and bishops choose the Irrational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents.

Blog: http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/

Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission)

E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com

Twitter : @LionelAndrades1