Why
should religious communities in Rome and the rest of the world welcome an ‘apostolic visitor’ who does
not interpret Vatican Council II rationally and honestly and so is not
apostolic or magisterial?
The religious community must interpret the Council
with the rational premise, inference and traditional conclusion and then expect
the Vatican visitor to do the same. This should be the public credentials of
the Visitor.
The
Vatican visitation cannot expect the religious community to accept ‘the reforms
of Vatican Council II’ interpreted with the fake premise. With the rational
premise there are no reforms. The Visitor has to return to the past exclusivist
ecclesiology of the Church with Vatican Council II interpreted rationally.
It must
be obligatory for the Visitor, sent by the Vatican, to only interpret LG 8,14,
15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, in Vatican Council II as referring to non
objective, hypothetical cases in 2023. This is interpreting Vatican Council II rationally.
Pope Francis can no more support LGBT-sex, polygamy, married priests, women’s ordination and expect the religious communities and also future vocations to do the same.Since now the religious communities can interpret Vatican Council II rationally and the Council supports the past ecclesiocentrism and so traditional faith and morals.
The
Council supports the traditional proclamation of the Gospel with traditional
mission based upon exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. So this is the
theology the apostolic visitors must accept.
Religious communities like the Franciscans of the Immaculate and the Society of St.Pius X did the right thing when they rejected Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally. Now they must affirm Vatican Council II rational and ask all apostolic visitations to do the same before they begin their inspection. - Lionel Andrades
JULY 28, 2023
Things have changed in the Church. You can know more tell me that you justify your liberalism with Vatican Council, since I can justify my orthodoxy, also with Vatican Council II
TALKS ON VATICAN COUNCIL II BEING IN HARMONY WITH TRADITION AND THERE BEING TWO INTERPRETATIONS OF THE COUNCIL, ONE IS RATIONAL AND THE OTHER IS IRRATIONAL.
If you are a group of Catholics, liberal or traditionalist, I am willing to speak about this subject. I can present the material on this blog in an orderly way for you to understand quickly what I keep writing about. I available am in Rome ( only Rome) and there is no charge. The information will be given free. It will be illustrated with some graphics and photos.
I am a Catholic and I affirm the teachings of the Catholic Church as I have said often on this blog.
The difference between me and Catholics in general and also the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, is that they interpret Vatican Council II, the Creeds, Catechisms, Councils etc irrationally and I am rational.
I choose a rational premise and inference and so my conclusion is traditional.
The presentation could take 20 minutes or less.I will be available to answer questions.I do not have any new theology to offer. I simply avoid an irrational observation and we return to the old theology of the Magisterium and missionaries of the 16th century at the Latin Mass. This would be the general theology today, which is honest and rational, at every Mass and every Rite. It would have to be the lex orandi.
Please e-mail me at : lionelandrades10@gmail.com
p.s I do not have a telephone contact number and do not travel out of Rome.
ONLY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH SOLAMENTE LA CHIESA CATTOLICA
Lionel Andrades
Catholic lay man in Rome. Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.How can the Holy Spirit make an objective mistake ? So it is human error and not the Magisterium.
Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral.
It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms. There can be two interpretations.Catholics must choose the rational option.
Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, nontraditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional?
It is unethical when the popes, cardinals and bishops choose the Irrational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents.
Blog: http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/
Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission)
E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com
Twitter : @LionelAndrades1
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment