Thursday, December 7, 2023

I have e-mailed Alberto Melloni and his colleagues at the FSCIRE about their irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II and there is no denial from them. They actually agree with me : Is it legal when Melloni receives, reportedly, over a million euros annually, and intentionally interprets LG 8,1,4,15,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 irrationally and dishonestly ?

 

What about Alberto Melloni and the FSCIRE (Bologna School) interpretation of Vatican Council II?

I have e-mailed Alberto Melloni and his colleagues at the FSCIRE about their irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II and there is no denial from them. They actually agree with me. They interpret LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR3, NA 2, and GS etc, as being physically visible cases.For me they are invisible cases. So they interpret LG 8,14,15,16 etc as being explicit. For me they are implicit. For them they are objective and for me subjective. Vatican Council II is a break with the past ecclesiocentrism for the FSCIRE ; there are visible exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). For me invisible cases cannot be objective exceptions for EENS in the present times.

Alberto Melloni and the FSCIRE and the Archdiocese of Bologna, are officially and publically are irrational. They continue to confuse what is invisible as being visible and then conclude that the Council is a break with Tradition. This is not ethical. This cannot be Magisterial. Since the Holy Spirit will not ask us to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and so deceptively. It is only with the deception in theology and philosophy that the FSCIRE can support their liberalism.

Melloni and Ursula Von der Leyen and the rest of the European Union, choose the fake premise (invisible people are visible). If they choose the rational premise then they would return to the ecclesiology of the Middle Ages.

Melloni does not deny that he chooses to interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, as physically invisible examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church in the present times. So for Melloni, they are practical exceptions for the dogma EENS, the Syllabus of Errors and the Athanasius Creed. If he interprets LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, as being physically invisible cases, then Vatican Council II would have no exceptions for the ecclesiocentrism of the Middle Ages. The Council is no more a break with Tradition.

Is it legal when Melloni receives, reportedly,  over a million euros annually, and intentionally interprets LG 8,1,4,15,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 irrationally and dishonestly ?

He will not be corrected by the Auxiliary Bishops and the Vicar General of Rome, who also interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and deceptively. Even Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez, interprets Vatican Council II wrongly and this cannot be Magisterial. 

The popes from Paul VI to Francis have been interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally, dishonestly, non traditional and non Magisterially.

This is not Catholic. Over the centuries, the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance were always interpreted as being invisible cases. This is common sense. All the books/articles  on Vatican Council II written by Alberto Melloni, the FSCIRE and researchers approved by him, were written with the irrational and not rational premise. 

-Lionel Andrades



DECEMBER 9, 2021

Alberto Melloni is dishonest. He uses a False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II

 

Alberto  Melloni is dishonest. He uses a False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II.-Lionel Andrades


APRIL 20, 2021

Almost all the TV Stations in Italy have had to interview Alberto Melloni and project his non Magisterial interpretation of Vatican Council II with the false premise

 Almost all the TV Stations in Italy have had to interview Alberto Melloni and project his non Magisterial interpretation of Vatican Council II with the false premise. - Lionel Andrades


DECEMBER 7, 2020

If Prof. Alberto Melloni of the Bologna School would interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise of the New Theology, the Italian Government may not continue to finance him.He would be taking the Catholic Church back to Tradition

 If Prof. Alberto Melloni of the Bologna School would interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise of the New Theology, the Italian Government may not continue to finance him.He would be taking the Catholic Church back to Tradition. -Lionel Andrades



John XXIII Foundation for Religious Sciences (FSCIRE), the "Bologna School, interprets Vatican Council II with the common false premise.There is no transparency on this issue


MARCH 5, 2020


All the books in Italy which cite Vatican Council II, in general are in error, since the Council is interpreted with a false premise, inference and conclusion. So it is wrong for the Italian Government to annually finance the Fondazione per le scienze religiose Giovanni XXIII( Bologna School )of Alberto Melloni. He receives about a million a year it is reported.

All the books in Italy which cite Vatican Council II, in general are in error, since the Council is interpreted with a false premise, inference and conclusion. So it is wrong for the Italian Government to annually finance the Bologna School of Alberto Melloni. He receives about a million a year it is reported.
Gabriele Albonetti of the Leftist Partito Democratico is  member of the Board of Trustees of Melloni's Fondazione per le scienze religiose Giovanni XXIII, also called the Bologna School.
Melloni  does not affirm Vatican Council II without the false premise, for then the Council would support the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).Melloni's talks on Lutheranism would then be false.His talk on Italian society today being based on Vatican Council II  interpreted irrationally , is also false.His talks on the Council supporting the liberalism of Pope Francis is also false.The interpretation of Vatican Council II with the irrationality, is now obsolete.
-Lionel Andrades



MARCH 5, 2020

All the books and articles on Vatican Council II in Italy were written with a false premise, inference and conclusion.Lionel's Blog is an exception.Salvini's Lega political party could take up this issue in the Italian Senate 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/03/all-books-and-articles-on-vatican.html

 

ARCH 4, 2020

The political party Lega Salvini needs to take up the issue in the Italian Senate of the Italian priests Fathers Riccardo Petroni, Matteo Riboli, Lorenzo Mazzetti di Pietralata, Emanuele Lonardi and Enrico D'Urso deprived of the status of being a priest and made lay men, by Archbishop Peregro in Ferrara, who rejects the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) with an irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II, supported by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF), Vatican 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/03/the-political-party-lega-salvini-needs.html




 FEBRUARY 22, 2020


Italian Government finances Alberto Melloni's Bologna School with a million euros annually : it uses a false premise, inference and conclusion to interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition


The Italian government is funding Alberto Melloni's John XXIII Foundation for Religious Sciences (FSCIRE), the headquarters of the so-called "Bologna School,"1 guaranteed another yearly million-euro funding for 2020–2022.Melloni uses the irrational model to interpret Vatican Council II. It is only with a false premise, inference and conclusion that he makes the Council a rupture with Tradition. He could choose the rational premise, inference and conclusion.
  
_________________________________________



    
___________________________________________


   
  
 With this rational model, the  Vatican, the Bologna School, Archbishop Pegro and Cardinal Matteo Zuppi , would not be contradicting the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.

ATHANASIUS CREED

Image result for Athanasius Creed pHOTO

'Whosoever will be saved, before all things it is necessary that he hold the catholic faith. Which faith unless every one do keep whole and undefiled, without doubt he shall perish everlastingly...'

___________________________________




WEDNESDAY, JUNE 24, 2020
Pope Francis interprets the Creeds with a false premise, inference and conclusion. This was un precedented over the centuries.
Pope Pius XII and Pope John XXIII and the following popes, interpreted extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) with a false premise.Pope Paul VI and the following popes interpreted Vatican Council II with the false premise.
Now Pope Francis interprets the Creeds and Vatican Council Ii with the false premise and so creates a hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition on ecumenism, traditional ecclesiocentic mission, liturgy with the old exclusivist ecclesiology and traditional ecclesiology.It's a different Catholic Church now.The whole Church is following him in the error, conservatives and liberals.
Bishop Schneider, Maike Hickson and John Henry Weston continue to interpret LG 8 and UR 3 in Vatican Council II as exceptions to EENS. Bishop Bernard Fellay  did this continously. He never corrected himself. He probably will go to the end of his life, with this error, like Fr.Nicholas Gruner   and John Vennari.
If the popes interpret the Creeds without the false premise, like me,  they would be opposed by the Jewish Left.There would be persecution.Now there is support.
The two popes do not affirm the Creeds to avoid a persecution of the Church. They have changed the faith-teachings of the Church.
So the official Profession of Faith and Oath of Office for Cardinals, Bishops, Rectors, Superiors and Parish Priests are mere words supporting heresy and dissent.-Lionel Andrades
_____________________________


MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 2023

Francesca Cadeddu is a researcher at Alberto Melloni’s FSCIRE.She does not know about Vatican Council II (rational), interprets the Council unethically and writes books on religious illiteracy

 Francesca Cadeddu is a researcher at Alberto Melloni’s FSCIRE,the President of the European Academy of Religion and is a researcher at the University of Moderna Regina-Emilia. She interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and unethically and writes books in praise of John Courtney Murray, who did the same.Murray, like Rahner, Ratzinger, Congar, Lefebvre and Kung interpreted Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally.

She features on leftist TV in Italy and would be welcome at any of the pontifical universities like the Biblicum, which also interpret Vatican Council II with the common fake premise, inference and non traditional conclusion.

She has written books on fighting religious illiteracy, while she does not seem to know that the Council can be interpreted rationally and is in harmony with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus of Pope Honorious and the Order of Preachers in 1215.

Melloni is the founder of the European Academy of Religion. Since 2020 he has been the Chief Scientific Advisor of the European Commission according to his biodata. His interpretation of Vatican Council II is as irrational and unscientific as that of Ursula Von der Leyden, the President of the European Union.There is no denial from the FSCIRE, the EU or the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican. - Lionel Andrades 

https://www.fscire.it/card-1619078544

https://berkleycenter.georgetown.edu/people/francesca-cadeddu

https://www.religiousstudiesproject.com/persons/francesca-cadeddu/


___________________________________________________




SEPTEMBER 24, 2023

Intentionally the FSCIRE and the European Union choose a false premise and inference. This is even after they are informed.

 Euractiv Italia | EURACTIV Italia

 13 lug 2023

Alberto Melloni and the FSCIRE correspondents and staff agree with me. The FSCIRE and the European Union have been interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally i.e. LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, do not refer to hypothetical and invisible cases in 1965-2023 for them. They are physically visible cases. Only in this way they can be made exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). So for the FSCIRE and EU , LG 8,14,15,16 etc, are objective examples of salvation outside the Church and are  practical exceptions for the dogma EENS. This is irrational and it is their mistake.There are no denials or clarifications from the FSCIRE. For me LG 8 etc refer to invisible cases. This is common sense. They are not objective exceptions for the dogma EENS, for me.

The FSCIRE and the European Union have all these years interpreted LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc as being physically visible examples of salvation outside the Church. This was their false premise. So they inferred that these cases were practical exceptions for the dogma EENS, which had become obsolete. This was their irrational premise and inference.It was irrational and unscientific.

For me LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, GS 22 etc, refer to hypothetical cases only. They cannot be physically visible in 1965-2023.If anyone is saved outside the Catholic Church it could only be known to God. We cannot say that any particular person has been saved or will be saved with the baptism of desire (LG 14) and invincible ignorance (I.I). No one saw St. Emerentiana in Heaven without the baptism of water.

So for me, Vatican Council II does not mention any exceptions for the dogma EENS and the Athanasius Creed, which says all need the Catholic faith for salvation. Vatican Council II has the hermeneutic of continuity with the Syllabus of Errors and the Catechisms of Pope Pius X and Trent. The Councils supports the past exclusivist ecclesiology. There is no rupture with the ecclesiocentrism of the missionaries of the 16th century.

The interpretation of Vatican Council II by the FSCIRE (Bologna School) is now obsolete.It is political.It is not Catholic. It is unethical. Since intentionally the FSCIRE chooses a false premise and inference. This is even after they are informed.

Vatican Council II has to be interpreted only rationally and so there cannot be a New Theology, New Ecumenism, New Ecclesiology, New Evangelization and New Canon Law. Since this New Theology is based upon Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally and this is dishonest. The New Theology separates Jesus from the necessity of the Catholic Church for salvation.It does this with alleged exceptions for EENS. 

But now we know that the Council no more has exceptions for the dogma EENS. So there no more is a separation (  when speaking about salvation) between Jesus and the Catholic Church. Membership in the Catholic Church is needed for salvation.It is not enough to believe in Jesus, according to the Christian denonominations.

So how can Alberto Melloni and the European Union, with their books, articles and reports on Vatican Council II, project the Council as a break with Tradition and then give the green light for liberalism, like homosexual unions?

Vatican Council II is no more ‘a revolution’ in the Church but a continuation with Tradition. The Ratzinger liberal theology made a mistake. It had its foundation upon the error in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston. This Letter, projected invisible cases of the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance, as being visible exceptions for Feeneyite EENS. This remained the error of the popes from Pius XII to Francis and the European Union and Alberto Melloni follow it. All the reports and videos on the Vatican website follow this mistake.This is being tacitly acknowledged by Alberto Melloni.  - Lionel Andrades



SEPTEMBER 23, 2023

Ursula von der Leyden who has been accused of plagiarism in the past is now interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally and unethically and there is no denial from Alberto Melloni, Secretary of the FSCIRE (Bologna School) and neither from the Cardinal-Archbishop of Bologna, Matteo Zuppi

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/09/ursula-von-leyden-who-has-been-accused.html


SEPTEMBER 21, 2023

Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Union and Alberto Melloni, Director of the FSCIRE are still interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally. This is unethical.It is deceptive.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/09/ursula-von-de-leyen-president-of.html


SEPTEMBER 17, 2023

Alberto Melloni (FSCIRE- Bologna School) and Ursula Von Leyden in this video are interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally and unethically

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/09/alberto-melloni-fscire-bologna-school.html


SEPTEMBER 13, 2023

All the books on Vatican Council II written by Alberto Melloni, of the FSCIRE and those published by the SSPX’s Angelus Press, are authored with the irrational and not rational premise. There is no denial from the FSCIRE or the SSPX.

WEDNESDAY, JUNE 24, 2020 

Pope Francis interprets the Creeds with a false premise, inference and conclusion. This was un precedented over the centuries.

Pope Francis interprets the Creeds with a false premise, inference and conclusion. This was un precedented over the centuries.
Pope Pius XII and Pope John XXIII and the following popes, interpreted extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) with a false premise.Pope Paul VI and the following popes interpreted Vatican Council II with the false premise.
Now Pope Francis interprets the Creeds and Vatican Council Ii with the false premise and so creates a hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition on ecumenism, traditional ecclesiocentic mission, liturgy with the old exclusivist ecclesiology and traditional ecclesiology.It's a different Catholic Church now.The whole Church is following him in the error, conservatives and liberals.
Bishop Schneider, Maike Hickson and John Henry Weston continue to interpret LG 8 and UR 3 in Vatican Council II as exceptions to EENS. Bishop Bernard Fellay  did this continously. He never corrected himself. He probably will go to the end of his life, with this error, like Fr.Nicholas Gruner   and John Vennari.
If the popes interpret the Creeds without the false premise, like me,  they would be opposed by the Jewish Left.There would be persecution.Now there is support.
The two popes do not affirm the Creeds to avoid a persecution of the Church. They have changed the faith-teachings of the Church.
So the official Profession of Faith and Oath of Office for Cardinals, Bishops, Rectors, Superiors and Parish Priests are mere words supporting heresy and dissent.
-Lionel Andrades
______________________________
MARCH 5, 2020
All the books in Italy which cite Vatican Council II, in general are in error, since the Council is interpreted with a false premise, inference and conclusion. So it is wrong for the Italian Government to annually finance the Bologna School of Alberto Melloni. He receives about a million a year it is reported.
Gabriele Albonetti of the Leftist Partito Democratico is  member of the Board of Trustees of Melloni's Fondazione per le scienze religiose Giovanni XXIII, also called the Bologna School.
Melloni  does not affirm Vatican Council II without the false premise, for then the Council would support the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).Melloni's talks on Lutheranism would then be false.His talk on Italian society today being based on Vatican Council II  interpreted irrationally , is also false.His talks on the Council supporting the liberalism of Pope Francis is also false.The interpretation of Vatican Council II with the irrationality, is now obsolete.
-Lionel Andrades


Posted by at
Labels:

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)