Fr.David Sherry, the District Superior of Canada, in this video below does not interpret Vatican Council II rationally and so produces the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition and then blames the popes.

 Fr.David Sherry, the District Superior of Canada,  in this video below  does not interpret Vatican Council II rationally and so produces the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition and then blames the popes.

 Even Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre did not interpret Vatican Council II, rationally, and so expose the objective mistake in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston, issued by Pope Pius XII. 1

I have tried to speak to the SSPX priest  in Rome . He does not want to proclaim the Catholic Faith on Vatican Council II interpreted rationally. Like the SSPX bishops and priests he interprets the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms irrationally to reject the dogma EENS according to the Church Councils (1215 etc) which did not mention any exceptions. This is a kind of political position of the SSPX on Vatican. They are not talking about it. They 'do not hold fast to what was beleived by all Catholics over all time'.

Part of the crisis in the Church is that the traditionalists have become modernists like those many Catholics who attend the Novus Ordo Mass. Many prominent Catholic politicians are in this category. - Lionel Andrades

1

APRIL 6, 2024

The Lega Salvini and other conservative political parties in Italy do not affirm the Catholic Faith on Vatican Council II. They want to be politically correct with the Left. Even the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) and the Vatican do not proclaim Vatican Council II interpreted rationally

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/04/the-lega-salvini-and-other-conservative.html

___________________________________________________________

APRIL 5, 2024

If a non Catholic goes or does not go to Heaven in any particular case it can only be known to God, the norm for salvation is faith and baptism (AG 7), the norm is the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), the Catechism of the Catholic Church says ‘the Church does not know of any means other than Baptism that assures entry into eternal beatitude’. – Catechism of the Catholic Church, The Necessity of Baptism, 1257

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/04/if-non-catholic-goes-or-does-not-go-to.html

APRIL 1, 2024

Cindy Wooden, Fr. Georges de Laire and Brother Andre Marie micm, are all Feeneyites on extra ecclesiam nulla salus when Vatican Council II is interpreted rationally by them

 

Vatican Council II can only be interpreted rationally. This is the only ethical option available. So Fr. Georges de Laire is a Feeneyite on the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus like Brother Andre Marie micm and the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary in New Hampshire , USA.

 The correspondents of the National Catholic Reporter can only be 'progressive' if they interpret Vatican Council II irrationally, dishonestly and so non traditionally. There is no more support for their liberalism when Vatican Council II is interpreted honestly. There automatically is a hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition.

The line in purple is important. It decides if Vatican Council II is traditional or liberal.

When Fr. Georges de Laire interprets hypothetical cases as just being hypothetical in Vatican Council II, then there are no practical exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, mentioned in the text of Vatican Council II.

All the religioius communities, parish priests and rectors can interpret invisible cases of LG 8,14,15,16,UR 3, NA 2 etc in Vatican Council II as not being objectively visible exceptions for the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation or Ad Gentes 7 which says all need faith and baptism for salvation.There is nothing in Vatican Council II to contradict Ad Gentes 7 or the Catechism of the Catholic Church (845,846 Outside the Church there is no salvation).

- Lionel Andrades

APRIL 5, 2024

The baptism of desire was always invisible and it could only be known to God. This is a given, it is a constant in the Church over the centuries. Taylor Marshall confirmed that there are no explicit cases of St. Thomas Aquinas’s implicit baptism of desire. This is common sense.

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/04/the-baptism-of-desire-was-always.html