Saturday, May 20, 2017

Vatican Council II is triumphalistic. SSPX wake up from your sleep endorse Vatican Council II (Feeneyite).Ask the Synod cardinals to do the same

Image result for Photo of Bishop Fellay Church Militant TV agreementPope Francis referred to Vatican Council II.He said  triumphalism will not be accepted.So  if the SSPX wants a personal perlature they need to wake up. Make an announcement.Accept Vatican Council II, but only Vatican Council II (Feeneyite), as I call it.It is triumphalistic for all.So the popes and cardinals will reject it and the Council may no more be a requirement for a personal prelature.They will not be able to say that the SSPX must accept Vatican Council II. Instead it will be the SSPX asking every one else to accept Vatican Council II
Appeal to the two popes and every  cardinal and bishop.Ask them to affirm Vatican Council II.Tell them to affirm a triumphalistic Vatican Council II, since Vatican Council II rationally and without deception cannot be anything else.
Make Vatican Council II an issue. Affirm it.Ask Ecclesia Dei to affirm a triumphalistic Vatican Council (F), since Archbishop Pozzo says Vatican Council II has a hermeneutic of continuity.Ask him to affirm Vatican Council (Feeneyite-call it by any name you want).Vatican Council II is triumphalistic just like Catholic Tradition.
The Society of St.Pius X(SSPX) acts as if they are ignorant in Catholic theology and doctrine.They are not able to discuss this subject in public. They not capable of issuing a press statement or a comment on their outdated websites.
There are no practical exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) said Chris Ferrara, so then there are obviously two interpretations of Vatican Council II.One in which every body assumes  there are practical exceptions to EENS and the other in which I do not interpret Vatican Council II, as having any practical exception to EENS.
The SSPX could at least in a statement or through one of their superiors acknowledge this.
When they acknowledge that there can be an interpretation of Vatican Council II with no known exceptions to the dogma EENS( Feeneyite) they can tell their supporters and the CDF that they,the SSPX, were wrong  about the Council (like about every body else including the CDF).They were correct about Vatican Council II (Cushingite) but did not know about Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite).
Then with Vatican Council II( Feeneyite) the Council  can be interpreted in harmony with the SSPX General Chapter Doctrinal Statement 2012 on EENS, which  the Vatican has thrown in the rubbish bin.
The SSPX could conclude that even though the CDF doctrinally does not accept the 2012 General Chapter Statement, the SSPX can accept Vatican Council II in harmony with the dogma EENS  as it was known for example, to the 16th century magisterium.It is in harmony with the SSPX General Chapter Statement.
So Vatican Council II is no more an issue in doctrinal talks.
The SSPX has the choice.
Now they can affirm the Council in harmony with the dogma EENS, the Syllabus of Errors, the past ecclesiology which only allows for an ecumenism of return and no salvation for non Catholics who are not members of the church.Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) is in harmony with the non separation of Church and State, which is a priority, since outside the Church there is no salvation.
All need to be members of the Catholic Church to avoid the fires of Hell.This is Vatican Council II. It is triumphalistic.

Vatican Council II( Feeneyite) is saying outside the Church there is no salvation(all need faith and baptism for salvation-AG 7) and nor the possibility of salvation.This was also how the SSPX General Chapter Statement put it.Since LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to invisible and not visible cases.So they are not exceptions to the dogma EENs.They are irrelevant to EENS. They are not practical exceptions to EENS.LG 16 etc never ever were exceptions to EENS as it was interpreted by Fr.Leonard Feeney and the St.Benedict Center mentioned in the Letter of the Holy Office 1939. Cardinal Francesco Marchetti Selvaggiani who issued the Letter in 1949 made a mistake.
Cardinal Francesco Marchetti Selvaggiani mistook invisible -for- us- baptism of desire as being a visible- for- us exception to EENS.He mistook unknown cases of being saved in invincible ignorance( allegedly without the baptism of water) as being personally known people, even though, these cases would be in Heaven and not visible to any one on earth.No one on earth can say that a saint is in Heaven without the baptism of water and instead with the baptism of desire etc.So there were no known exceptions past or present, to the dogma EENS.
When the cardinals in 1949 and 1965 assumed that there were exceptions to EENS, this was false.They created a new theology which was irrational, foreign and an innovation.This Cushingite theology is expresed in the text of Vatican Council II.
Vatican Council II now is no more controversial, at  least for the SSPX and the traditionalists. It is a past tense issue.
A Catholic can affirm it in harmony with what the secular media calls the 'rigorist interpretation' of the dogma EENS.Popes Francis and Benedict , the Jesuits and the Masons, call this interpretation  'triumphalism'.
The SSPX theologians and Superiors need to discuss and acknowledge this.
 Image result for Photo Synod of cardinals
Then contact the cardinals and bishops who made up the last Synod.Ask them  to also please affirm Vatican Council II.Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) must then be accepted by them since it is rational, traditional, non heretical and has the hermeneutic of continuity with the past.Vatican Council II (Cushingite) is the opposite.They need to reject it.
 Image result for funny sleep pictures
SSPX wake up from your sleep.Affirm Vatican Council II(Feeneyite).Ask the Synod-cardinals to do the same.
SSPX endorse Vatican Council II. The Council is triumphalistic only with Vatican Council II( Feeneyite).-Lionel Andrades

 April 27, 2017

The dogma “Outside the Church there is no salvation” has been changed surreptitiously by confused ideas -Bishop Bernard Fellay

April 28, 2017

Bishop Fellay does not realize that he is confused between Feeneyism and Cushingism
May 18, 2017
No canonical status for the SSPX this year.Reconciliation talks have failed.Doctrine divides for a corrupt magisterium

May 14, 2017
Pope Francis confirms : SSPX cannot interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyite theology and the hermeneutic of continuity : it would be 'triumphalism'
May 13, 2017
Archbishop Guido Pozzo issues 'fake news' on Vatican Council II and the SSPX.

May 13, 2017
Abp.Pozzo is specious on SSPX confusion : does not differentiate between Vatican Council II Feeneyite and Cushingite, without the irrational premise or with it

May 13, 2017
'The dogma of the faith' is not lost: SSPX could trigger a schism and 'bring Rome back to the Faith'


May 11, 2017

Robert Spencer and Michael Voris can quote me.I am ready to affirm Vatican Council II( Feeneyite).It is the official teaching of the Catholic Church

May 10, 2017

This will be a theological earthquake for Pope Benedict and the present magisterium which is sustaining heresy in the Catholic Church

May 9, 2017

Pope Benedict praised Vatican Council II's hermeneutic of rupture with extra ecclesiam nulla salus : seeks the same for Muslims

May 5, 2017

My interpretation of the Nicene Creed differs from that of Bishop Bernard Fellay and Bishop Alain Planet : they are irrational, non traditional and heretical

May 1, 2017

Pope Benedict's magisterial heresy is 'a guide for the perplexed' for Tracey Rowland

April 29, 2017

The new irrational theology is being taught at SSPX seminaries.It is used to interpret Vatican Council II.Contradicts Jesus in Mark 16:16


No comments: