Tuesday, July 18, 2017

Everyone agrees Vatican Council II has a major philosophical mistake

The reference for Lumen Gentium 16, Vatican Council II is the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 1

Today we know that the Letter made an objective mistake.Invisible cases of being saved in invincible ignorance cannot be visible exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).This same philosophical error was the bad reasoning at Vatican Council II.This cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit.
The initial error was not corrected by Pope Pius XII and Pope John XXIII also overlooked the mistake.Nor did he lift the excommunication of Fr. Leonard Feeney.So Catholics believed that there were exceptions to the traditional interpretation of EENS.
Then so much of Vatican Council II was based on this error.In principle hypothetical cases were assumed to be objective.They are mentioned in the text - LG 16, LG 8, LG 14, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22, AG 7, AG 11 etc.
Cardinal Ottaviani and Archbishop Lefebvre said nothing.Mons. Clifford Fenton, Ludwig Ott and Fr.William Most said nothing.They did not ask themselves how can invisible people be visible exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.
So the Council has been built on human error.It is heretical. It is not simply non traditional and irrational.
With an irrational premise the dogma EENS has been rejected.
With an irrational premise the Nicene Creed means 'I believe in three or more baptisms and they exclude the baptism of water. They are desire, blood, invincible ignorance, seeds of the Word(AG 11) etc'.
With an irrationality Pope Benedict confirmed in March 2016 that Vatican Council II was 'a developmen't of the dogma EENS. It was no more like it was for the magisterium of the 16th century and he was not going to interpret the Council without the irrational premise.
He was acknowledging that the development came from the Letter of the Holy Office, a private letter from one bishop to another which the Archdiocese of Boston made public three years after it was issued by Rome and which his friend Fr. Karl Rahner placed in the Denzinger.

Ralph Martin and Robert Fastiggi do not deny that Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise and non traditional conclusion.2
Ralph Martin does not deny 1) that the baptism of desire is not physically visible in 2017 and that 2) invisible baptism of desire is not an explicit exception to the dogma EENS
Ralph Martin does not deny that Pope Francis has made the same two philosophical errors in his interpretation of Vatican Council II. He has violated the Principle of Non Contradiction.
In other words the pope made an objective mistake in the interpretation of Vatican Council II.Ralph Martin himself has been teaching this error at the Sacred Heart Major Seminary, Detroit.
He does not deny that when he wrote his books on Evangelisation and 'Will Many Be Saved'(Amazon)
he made the above two errors.Everyone agrees I.I is not an exception to EENS and yet this was the reasoning at Vatican Council II.This is a major philosophical error. It runs through Vatican Council II like a theme(LG 16, LG 8, LG 14, UR 3, NA 2,AG 7, AG 11, GS 22 etc).This is not the teaching of the Holy Spirit.
-Lionel Andrades


Diabolical disorientation is due to the one turning point in the Church's life which has been entirely detrimental to the faith. Lumen Gentium Chapter 2 Section 16: Those also can attain to salvation who through no fault of their own do not know the Gospel of Christ or His Church, yet sincerely seek God and moved by grace strive by their deeds to do His will as it is known to them through the dictates of conscience. (19) Cfr. Epist. S.S.C.S. Officii ad Archiep. Boston.: Denz. 3869-72.
Footnote 19 gives source authority to the 1949 Holy Office Pelagian heresy letter to Archbishop Cushing and is the theological foundation for modern ecumenism and ecumenism is the theological foundation for the Novus Ordo and justifies the overthrow of nearly all traditional Catholic teaching resulting in our Church being, for the most part, Neo-Protestant.-Warren Goddard

Featured Image
Ralph Martin and Robert Fastiggi do not deny that Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise and non traditional conclusion


December 15, 2016
Image result for photos of Vatican Council II
DECEMBER 15, 2016
Sedevacantist Bishop Donald Sanborn unaware of many philosophical errors in Vatican Council http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/12/sedevacantist-bishop-donald-sanborn.html

DECEMBER 14, 2016

Catholic professors in Rome now tell lies : pontifical universities don't want to be quoted on a philosophical subject


DECEMBER 13, 2016


DECEMBER 13, 2016

Traditionalists too unaware of major philosophical mistake : many errors in Vatican Council II


DECEMBER 13, 2016
Too many mistakes in Vatican Council II

DECEMBER 12, 2016

Vatican Council II riddled with philosphical error : two popes in principle support objective error in text


DECEMBER 11, 2016

The source of the present Arian-like heresy throughout the Church today is due to the following points


DECEMBER 10, 2016

The present magisterium has made a major philosophical mistake


DECEMBER 11, 2016

Priest confirms philosophical error : Lefebvre excommunication a mistake


DECEMBER 10, 2016

Scholars supporting four cardinals in major philosophical mistake

DECEMBER 1, 2016

There is a mistake in Vatican Council II and once the error is identified and avoided, the interpretation of the Council radically changes.There is no 'spirit of Vatican Council II ' excuse anymore


NOVEMBER 29, 2016

So it is only by using an irrationality that the present magisterium can re-interpret magisterial documents and say Vatican Council II indicates all Jews and Muslims in Italy do not need to convert into the Catholic Church in 2016

NOVEMBER 28, 2016

Yet it is with this reasoning that cardinals Ratzinger,Kasper and other liberals interpret Vatican Council II. They use an irrational premise to create a non traditional and heretical conclusion.They with their executive power in the Vatican, they call it magisterial


NOVEMBER 23, 2016

The Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate have set a precedent for all religious communities.They have announced that they accept Vatican Council II without Rahnerian theology.This is extra ordinary. Since they are not denying the Council and neither are they denying Tradition


NOVEMBER 21, 2016

Can the SSPX accept Vatican Council II like the Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate to get canonical status ? : No one tells the pope that he is interpreting Vatican Council II with bad philosophy and bad theology which has now been exposed

NOVEMBER 20, 2016

When we get rid of the Rahnerian theology to interpret Vatican Council II then Catholics in general can know the importance of the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation : Feast of Christ the King

NOVEMBER 14, 2016

Don Francesco Riscossa has made an objective error. Lumen Gentium 8 refers to a hypothetical case and so it is not relevant or an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus which he has cited in part one of the conference.

NOVEMBER 13, 2016
Don Allessandro Minutella does not deny it : there is no theology in Vatican Council II to contradict the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and an ecumenism of return, Vatican Council II is in accord with the Lefbrists and 'integralists' whom he criticizes in the video

NOVEMBER 8, 2016

Today the magisterium wants the SSPX to affirm Vatican Council II with hypothetical cases being objective in the present times and they are not doing so.Neither would I.

NOVEMBER 8, 2016

Once we avoid the new theology, with the irrational premise then the conclusion is traditional. We have the old ecclesiology and upon it we base the teaching on religious liberty, ecumenism and inter-religious dialogue


NOVEMBER 8, 2016

Once you have identified the new theology and avoided it,it is possible to view Vatican Council II in the light of Tradition. We would be back to the old ecclesiology at any Mass


No comments: