3.So why does the professor at the sedevacantist seminary make this claim that they are in in mortal sin? Is he not wrong?
Eric : No, he is not wrong.
Lionel: In other words like Eric(Gajiewski) and Bishop(Donald) Sanborn we have to accept that invisible baptism of desire is visible.
Then we have to conclude that this invisible baptism of desire is a visible exception to all needing to be members of the Church for salvation.
Then we have to conclude that there is known salvation outside the Church since invisible baptism of desire is visible.
Then those who do not say that invisible for us baptism of desire is visible and is an exception to traditional EENS ,will be in mortal sin according to Fr.Anthony Cekada.
Those who admit that they can see BOD, BOB and I.I cases in the present times will not be in mortal sin.
So Fr. Antony Cekada is not wrong for Eric(Gajiewski).
-Lionel Andrades
-Lionel Andrades
https://gloria.tv/article/SFTfFgMgZVx83F9TCSnBbGaiN
No comments:
Post a Comment