I don't think sedevacantism is the answer since we see traditionalist and conservative Catholics making errors in theology and doctrine

Comment on the blog Vox Cantoris

I don't think sedevacantism is the answer since we see traditionalist and conservative Catholics making errors in theology and doctrine and they still will not correct themself.

Chris Ferrara and Roberto dei Mattei wrote books on Vatican Council II unaware of the difference between Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) and Vatican Council II(Cushingite).

The sedevantists, Bishop Donald Sanborn and Fr.Anthony Cekada rejected Feeneyite EENS since they assumed that the baptism of desire refers to known people saved outside the Church. For me there are no such known people.

The sedevanatists Peter and Michael Dimond have rejected Vatican Council II since they interpret hyothetical cases mentioned in the Council (LG 16 etc) as being non hypothetical. So with this irrational premise there has to be a non traditional conclusion.They reject it of course.

The Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) and the St. Benedict Center(SBC-Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary) also accepted the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II, when there was a rational choice available.

They have all being criticizing the popes on Vatican Council II when the fault lies with their inference.Change the inference and change your understanding of the Catholic Church.

Now that they know about the error they are not formally affirming the old exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church since it would be Anti-Semitic etc.

-Lionel Andrades

Paul VI to be canonised a Saint? Oh come on now, you knew this was going to happen. 

http://voxcantor.blogspot.it/2017/12/paul-vi-to-be-canonised-saint-oh-come.html