What are you saying?
All of the current Pope's along with Archbishop Lefebvre,
Cardinal Ottavanni all the Pope's of Vatican II along with Pope's Pius XII , clergy many distinguished writers and layman are
all in HERESY over Bob(Baptism of Blood), Bod(baptism of Desire) and I.I(Invincible Ignorance) and except you are
correct?
Lionel:
Cushingism is a heretical philosophy and
theology.It changes the interpretation of magisterial
documents.
Feeneyism( according to L.A) is the traditional philosophy
and theology.When we avoid Cushingism we automatically return
to Feeneyism.We do not have to create a new theology or anything new.
For
me EENS Feeneyite says the baptism of desire (BOD) etc refer to invsible and unknown people in 2018
and so BOD etc are not relevant or exceptions to the dogma EENS.So I affirm
Feeneyite EENS.
For Archbishop Lefebvre and the popes since Pius XII it
is EENS(Cushingite). They believe that BOD,BOB and I.I refer to known
people saved outside the Church. BOD,BOB and I.I are examples of
salvation outside the Church.This is a rupture with the magisterium of the
16th century, for example.This would be heresy for the Magisterium in
the 16th century and the Church Councils which defined EENS.
Yet Pope
Benedict in March 2016 confirmed his Cushingite view of EENS .This was a
heresy of faith and it was manifest in public.
No one else objected since
generally they are interpreting Vatican Council II and EENS with
Cushingism.
So I affirm Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) and they all affirm
Vatican Council II(Cushingite).Don't you think one of us is in
heresy? Which is the rational, traditional and non heretical
interpretation,of EENS and Vatican Council II, for you? Theirs or mine? -Lionel Andrades
February 9, 2018
If Michael Voris could accept that Pope Pius XII, Card. Ottaviani and Abp Lefebvre were in heresy while Fr. Leonard Feeney was teaching Catholic orthodoxy then the interpretation of Vatican Council II would change for CMTV
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment