Tuesday, February 13, 2018

Understanding the Fr. Leonard Feeney case helps in the interpretation of Vatican Council II with Feeneyism instead of the present Cushingism

Once these terms and principles are understood you can re-interpret Vatican Council II.It would be unbelievable for most Catholics I mentioned in a previous blog post.1

Now it is also helpful to note that most Catholics are not aware that it was Archbishop Richard Cushing and the Holy Office 1949 of his time which was in heresy and not Fr. Leonard Feeney. Once this is understood, it is easier to re-interpret Vatican Council II.
Presently we choose to interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism, since for the present Magisterium, it is Fr. Leonard Feeney who was wrong for affirming the traditional interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus. He refused to say that invisible for us baptism of desire could not be a visible exception to EENS.For the Vatican today it is invisible cases of the baptism of desire etc are visible exceptions to EENS.The rest of the Church follows this irrationality.


Here are some links from this blog which could be helpful.
1.

FEBRUARY 11, 2018


VATICAN REVIEW THE FR.LEONARD FEENEY CASE

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/vatican-review-frleonard-feeney-case.html
2.
MSGR.CAMILLE PERL, SECRETARY OF ECCLESIA DEI IN A LETTER TO AN AUSTRALIAN LAYMAN DID NOT MENTION THAT THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE AND INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE WERE NOT EXCEPTIONS TO THE LITERAL INTERPRETATION OF THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/08/msgrcamille-perl-secretatry-of-ecclesia.html#links

 3.

 JULY 11, 2012

FEENEYISM IS IN ACCORD WITH MAGISTERIAL DOCUMENTS

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/07/feeneyism-is-in-accord-with-magisterial.html


4.

 FEBRUARY 12, 2018


Vatican(CDF) and Jesuits review the Fr.Leonard Feeney case : How could invisible cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance be visible exceptions to Feeneyite EENS?: The Magisterium made a mistake
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/vatican-and-jesuits-review-frleonard.html
5.

APRIL 13, 2013

The issue is not whether the baptism of desire/invincible ignorance results in justification or salvation but is it visible or not

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/04/the-issue-is-not-whether-baptism-of.html


6.

MARCH 14, 2013


Jesuit pope must be petitioned to correct the factual error of his community in the 1940's in Boston

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/03/jesuit-pope-must-be-petitioned-to.html


7.


Invincible ignorance etc were never relevant or an issue with extra ecclesiam nulla salus: the Americanists made it one



11.
March 15, 2013
Odds are that Pope Francis was teaching heresy at the Jesuit theology classes in Argentine

-Lionel Andrades


1.

FEBRUARY 13, 2018


Once these terms and principles are understood you can re-interpret Vatican Council II.It would be unbelievable for most Catholics.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/once-these-terms-and-principles-are.html





Posted by at
Labels:

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)