Things are so bad that Christopher Ferrara, Roberto dei Mattei and Fr. John Zuhlsdorf have no denial.They cannot say that I am wrong.Since they know that what I write is correct.They do not want to proclaim the Faith like me.
BISHOP FELLAY WILL NOT ASSIST CATHOLIC POLITICAL PARTIES.
It reminds me of Bishop Bernard Fellay who will criticize Vatican Council II as if it contradicts the Social Reign of Christ the King.However he will independently not affirm the Social Reign over all political legislation in concrete cases..Before national elections he would not call for support for certain political parties or inform Catholics about this issue.In Italy there was no public help given to Militia Christi and Forza Nuova before the recent elections.
FERRARA,MATTEI AND ZUHLSDORF WILL NOT AFFIRM EENS IN HARMONY WITH VATICAN COUNCIL II
Similarly Christopher Ferrara, Roberto dei Mattei and Fr. John Zuhlsdorf will not affirm the traditional interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) in harmony with Vatican Council II.They know that there are no exceptions to EENS mentioned in Vatican Council II.But they will not proclaim it.
AT CONFERENCES THEY WILL ONLY INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II WITH THE FALSE PREMISE AND THEN CRITICIZE IT
They will continue to speak at conferences criticizing Vatican Council II but they will not mention that the Council can be interpreted in harmony with the past ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.This means saying all Protestants and other Christians are on the way to Hell, unless they convert into the Church with Catholic Faith(AG 7).This is not proclaimed with reference to Vatican Council II.
VATICAN COUNCIL II SUPPORTS EENS AND THERE ARE NO PASSAGES WHICH CONTRADICT EENS
It is not said by them that Vatican Council II supports an ecumenism of return since UR 3, GS 22, LG 8, LG 16 etc refer to hypothetical, speculative and theoretical cases in 2018.So they are not references to objective exceptions to EENS in the present times.Also there are many orthodox passages in Vatican Council II which indicate that other Christians need to convert into the Catholic Church for salvation.
Vatican Council II has passages which support EENS and there are no passages which contradict EENS.
Like the liberals whom they criticize , Ferrara, Mattei and Zuhlsdorf, will only see Vatican Council II as a rupture with EENS and Tradition and then criticize the Council vaguely.The liberals are pleased.
THEY INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II LIKE THE LIBERALS.
Unlike the liberals, they will not affirm Vatican Council II in harmony with Feeneyite EENS, the Syllabus of Errors and an ecumenism of return based on the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.
The liberals are satisfied when traditionalist and conservative Catholics criticize Vatican Council II as a break with Tradition.The liberals, Vatican Curia and the Left will protest however if Vatican Council II is interpreted in harmony with Feeneyite EENS; EENS as it was known in the 16th century.
There is no comment on this issue from Christopher Ferrara, Roberto dei Mattei and Fr. John Zuhsldorf.-Lionel Andrades
APRIL 13, 2018
There is no apology or correction from Roberto dei Mattei and Christopher Ferrara for the books they wrote on Vatican Council II.They need to apologise for their ignorance, which was innocent.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/there-is-no-apology-or-correction-from.html
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/where-is-frjohn-zuhlsdorfs-catholic.html
APRIL 13, 2018
Catholic political parties and lay Catholics can first affirm the dogma EENS and then the Social Reign of Christ the King.In this way Catholics can enter in an organised way into the politics of France without any confusion in doctrine and theology :Macron's appeal to Catholics
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/catholic-political-parties-and-lay.html
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment