Feast of Christ the King today and no Vatican support for Catholic political parties which support the Social Reign of Christ the King : nor do they theologically help the Polish government

Today is the feast of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and one can hardly expect a Vatican office, for example that of culture or political affairs, to compliment the Catholic political parties who support the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation and see it as an alternative to the secular-atheistic model.

Things are so bad that even the Catholic political leaders in Poland who have consecrated their country to Christ the King, praise Pope Benedict who opposes the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation, as not being fair to other religions, and supports the secular-Left model.

So today to neither of the two popes or any cardinal or bishop can the Government in Poland could go for a coherent theological explanation for consecrating the country to Christ the King, in harmony with Tradition.Since every one rejects the traditional concept of the Social Reign of Christ the King, according to Quas Primas, or, which practically existed at the time of the papal states and the Polish saints. It is rejected since they interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism and so believe there is a rupture with Tradition.

For 50 years this has been the sad situation in the Catholic Church.It really is a misunderstanding of Vatican Council II, a misinterpretation.

Last month however  Cardinal Raymond Burke  seemed to create an opening towards  Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS- Feeneyite) and so there is a coherent theological possibility, to proclaim the Social Reign of Christ the King.He did so at the Voice of the Family Conference (May 18).So at least at this conference something new and good emerged.

In 2012 the SSPX also seemed to affirm Vatican Council II and EENS, Feeneyite, in their General Chapter Statement.But there was no follow up.

Theologically the SSPX are in a soup.Their website affirms Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) and EENS ( Cushingite) just like Pope Benedict  and the bishops, priests and laity in Poland.

So since, allegedly there is known salvation outside the Church for all of them, with their use of Cushingism,it will be asked, at least by the liberals, why proclaim the Social Reign of Christ the King ?

Cardinal Burke at least seems to have broken new ground on May 18 when he said other religions are false religions.He also traditionally affirmed Lumen Gentium 8(the true Church subsists in only the Catholic Church).

So if other religions were false religions for him then he was endorsing EENS ( Feeneyite).

Since other religions were false paths to salvation for him, he was interpreting Ad Gentes 7, Lumen Gentium 8 etc in Vatican Council II(Feeneyite),with the hermeneutic of continuity. He was not using the New Theology(Cushingism).

So seeing Vatican Council II as not being an exception to EENS was only possible with Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and other magisterial documents - interpreted with Feeneyism,only.

It means he was rejecting the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 (LOHO) which wrongly inferred that unknown cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I),were known exceptions to EENS ( Feeneyite).

Yes, he was still affirming BOD, BOB and I.I according to the popes and saints. For them BOD, BOB and I.I were only hypothetical cases.This is common sense. It is common knowledge for the average human being that is invisible people are visible, unknown people in 2018 are unknown.

So he was coherent in his theology I assume, if this is the foundational reasoning for his traditional theology expressed on  May 18.So Cardinal Burke would be interpreting Magisterial documents with the hermeneutic of continuity.

But this is not the theology of the present two popes, the Polish episcopate and the lay members of the Polish Government.They use Cushingism and so there is the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition.They all follow LOHO.There is a rupture with EENS and the past exclusivist ecclesiology so it would make mission and the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King, obsolete.Maybe this is why Pope Benedict does not mention either of the two. He supports LOHO.

LOHO was not a magisterial document but an inter-office communication between bishops and cardinals, which the liberal Fr.Karl Rahner s.j, placed in the Denzinger.

It also has an objective error,mixing up what is unknown as being known,which cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit.So in this sense it is not Magisterial.

So when Cardinal Burke goes to Poland again, may be he can explain to the Polish President and Prime Minister that they must switch to Vatican Council II and EENS, Feeneyite.In this way they theologically support the Social Reign of Christ the King and the non separation of Church and State in Poland.They have to discard, Pope Benedict's New Theology.Then Vatican Council II is not a rupture with Tradition as it was known to St. Maximillian Kolbe,St.Stanislaus Kotska and St. Faustina Kowalska, who were all Feeneyites with the traditional theology of the Catholic Church.-Lionel Andrades

JUNE 8, 2018

Cardinal Raymond Burke should call for the separation of secularism and state in general, to be replaced by the non separation of Church and State and the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King for all, and over all political legislation

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/cardinal-raymond-burke-should-call-for.html

JUNE 7, 2017

Poland recognizes the Holy See whose philosophy and theology is Cushingism :Vatican Council II is a rupture with Tradition - 1

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2017/06/poland-recognises-holy-see-whose.html

JUNE 6, 2017

Poland is consecrated to Christ the King but its Constitution is in accord with the Left.It is not Catholic but pro-Satan

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2017/06/poland-is-consecrated-to-christ-king.html

 APRIL 25, 2018

To return to Catholic doctrinal sanity in the country the Polish President Andrzej Duda must affirm common sense and what is common knowedlge by stating that :"There are no physically visible cases of the BOD,BOB and I.I in 2018" and " LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, NA 2, UR 3, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to only hypothetical cases 

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/04/to-return-to-catholic-doctrinal-sanity.html

OCTOBER 18, 2017

Polish Bishops object to exceptions in moral theology but wrongly accept it in salvation theology http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2017/10/polish-bishops-object-to-exceptions-in.html

JUNE 14, 2017

Polish Ambassadors to Vatican and Italy ask the Vatican to correct the errors on Wikipedia  http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2017/06/polish-ambassadors-to-vatican-and-italy_14.html

OCTOBER 15, 2017

We are in the same Church but the Polish bishops interpret the Nicene Creed, EENS, Vatican Council II and the Catechism differently  http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2017/10/we-are-in-same-church-but-polish.html