Repost : Ann Barnhardt and Eric Gajiewski(Trad Cat Knight) have no denial : they use a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II even when they can avoid it

AUGUST 2, 2017

Ann Barnhardt and Eric Gajiewski(Trad Cat Knight) have no denial : they use a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II even when they can avoid it

Ann Barnhardt and Eric Gajiewski(Trad Cat Knight) have no denial : they use a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II even when they can avoid it.

See - Ann Barnhardt and Eric Gajiewski who are educated and have learnt the faith have no denial.They believe Lumen Gentium 16 ( invincible ignorance) is an excepion to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and so Vatican Council II contradicts Tradition(EENS, Syllabus of Errors).They infer that LG 16 refers to a visible and known in person in 2017, or the last fifty or more years during their life time, who has been saved outside the Church, without 'faith and baptism'(AG 7).

They do not deny that this all along was their false inference with an irrational premise (hypothetical cases like LG 16 are physically visible).Invisible for us LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2,GS 22 etc were visible and not hypothetical.

Similarly they interpreted Mystici Corporis, Quanta Cura, the Catechisms of Trent and Pius X, St. Thomas Aquinas and other saints ,as mentioning known exceptions to the dogma EENS.Since the baptism of desire(BOD,baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance (I.I), when referred to in the past, was interpreted as being people personally known.So they re-interpreted the saints and popes of the past with the false inference.This was the new interpretation of the liberal theologians in Boston and Baltimore.They went back into history and all references to BOD,BOB and I.I were considered objective and explicit exceptions of salvation outside the Church.

An injustice was done to Fr.Leonard Feeney in Boston. Since BOD,BOB and I.I never were exceptions to the priest's traditional interpretation of the dogma EENS.Yet today Ann, Eric and the sedevacantist bishops malign him and support the old liberal initiative in Boston.

He was faithful to the teachings of the Church and rejected the fantasy theology, the new theology of Cushingism.Yet he was excommunicated.Now those who affirm the dogma EENS in the trational way are threathened with that same excommunication. Fr. Leonard Feeney after some 19 years had his excommunication lifted and was told to keep it to himself and not announce it. He was given a Catholc funeral with the bishop also there.-Lionel Andrades

JULY 31, 2017

For sedevacantists Eric Gajiewski and Ann Barnhardt LG 16 refers to a visible case and so Vatican Council II contradicts Tradition

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/fpr-sedevacantists-eric-gajiewski-and.html

SEPTEMBER 15, 2016

Ann Barnhardt with a false premise and conclusion misinterprets the Catholic Faith http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/09/ann-barnhardt-with-false-premise-and.html

Ann Barnhardt is a Catholic even though she violates the Principle of Non Contradiction http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/06/ann-barnhardt-is-catholic-even-though.html

FEBRUARY 7, 2015

There Is No Salvation Outside The Catholic Church (Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus) - Ann Barnhardt http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/02/there-is-no-salvation-outside-catholic.html

MARCH 1, 2017

TradCat Knight and Ann Barnhardt interpret extra ecclesiam nulla salus with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism, they use an irrational premise.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/03/tradcat-knight-and-ann-barnhardt.html

___________________________________

 JUNE 20, 2016

Prof.Phillip Blosser, a Professor of Philosophy at Musings of a Pertinacious Papist and Tancred at The Eponymous Flower agree with me : hypothetical cases (baptism of desire etc) cannot be explicit for us in 2016

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/06/profphillip-blosser-professor-of.html

_______________________________________