FEBRUARY 4, 2018
Ann Barnhardt will not submit
Vatican Council II is a rupture with Tradition only because Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and the present magisterium are correct for everyone and Fr. Leonard Feeney is wrong.If Fr. Leonard Feeney was correct and the magisterium and the SSPX were wrong then Vatican Council II is not a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors, extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and the past ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.
So Vatican Council II is a rupture with Tradition for Ann Barnhardt since she deplores Feeneyism and accepts Cushingism which is the theology of Archbishop Lefebvre and the SSPX traditionalists.
With Feeneyisn (according to Lionel Andrades and not the SBC), which is the rational and traditional philosophy and theology of the Catholic Church, Fr.Leonard Feeney and the St. Benedict Center of Boston were correct.Pope Pius XII and Cardinal Richard Cushing, the Archbishop of Boston were wrong.
So Ann Barnhardt with the present magisterium (since Pope Pius XII) is in heresy. Since she rejects the Syllabus of Errors and the past ecclesiology with her interpretation of Vatican Council II.She does not choose the rational philosophy and traditional theology.She interprets Vatican Council II and EENS with the irrational philosophy and non traditional theology of Cushingism( according to Lionel Andrades).
Like the Lefbvrist traditionalist Hilary White, she does not understand the difference between Feeneyism and Cushingism as a theology.Also their need for their traditionalists blog-donors makes it difficult to switch to rational Feeneyism.
To change the Nicene Creed by assuming unknown non Catholics, are known exceptions, to all needing the baptism of water in the Catholic Church, is a first class heresy.It is a mortal sin.
They attend the Tridentine Rite Mass as if all is normal and criticize Holy Mass in the vernacular, without publicly recanting their heresy, a mortal sin of faith.
Ann will not submit to Vatican Council II interpreted according to the authentic Magisterium of the Church.Neither will she affirm EENS according to the missionaries and magisterium of the 16th century.They did not consider invisible- for- us baptism of desire as being visible. So it was not an objective example of salvation outside the Church for them. Nor was it an exception to the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation.The dogma has been defined by three Church Councils and none of them mentioned the baptism of desire.-Lionel Andrades
FEBRUARY 3, 2018
SSPX is in doctrinal error like the magisterium and there is no denial from them : through their silence they admit their mistake
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/sspx-is-in-doctrinal-error-like.html
FEBRUARY 3, 2018
Ann Barnhardt cannot meet a baptism of desire (BOD) case in 2018 : Did Archbishop Lefebvre make a mistake ?
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/ann-barnhardt-cannot-meet-baptism-of.html
FEBRUARY 2, 2018
Would Ann Barnhardt be able to say that the SSPX bishops and Archbishop Lefebvre made an objective mistake?
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/would-ann-barnhardt-be-able-to-say-that.html
_________________________________
JULY 26, 2018
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment