Bishop Peter Libasci, the Bishop of Manchester, USA replaces Diane Quinlin as the Chancellor of the diocese.It is reported on the diocese website that she has retired. Meredith Cook, is the new the Vice Chancellor of the Diocese.
Diane Quinlin signed the Precepts of Prohibition against the St. Benedict Center in the diocese stating that legally they are not Catholics.
Quinlin did not answer when she was asked if invisible cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance can be visible exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Similarly she did not deny that there are no known cases of LG 8, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc which could be exceptions to EENS as it is interpreted by the St. Benedict Center.
So to suggest that there are practical exceptions to EENS is unethical and deceptive for her as a Chancellor and for Merdith Cook as Vice Chancellor.
It is unprofessional for Quinlin and Cook to imply that unknown cases of BOD, BOB and I.I are known and practical exceptions to EENS as it is interpreted by the St. Benedict Center. Similarly it is deceptive to suggest that Vatican Council II contradicts Feeneyite EENS.
There is no denial or clarification from the Chancellors or the Bishops.Also the doctrinal beliefs of the St. Benedict Center are not placed on the website of the diocese.
The Director of Catechesis in the diocese Mary Ellen Mahon agrees that there are no physically visible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I and LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Manchester, for them to be exceptions to 16th century EENS.This is the theological position of Brother Andre Marie MICM and the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary at the St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire.-Lionel Andrades
It is also un-ethical and unprofessional for the lay Chancellor,Diane Quinlin, to indicate that hypothetical cases( BOD, I.I etc) are practical exceptions in 2019 to the SBC position on EENS and so the SBC community members do not have a legal right to call themselves Catholic.
In
a court of law this would be seen as deception and subterfuge. This
would be a misuse of power.It could be seen as coercion with false
information.
This is not being Catholic.
Also
Catholics in other parts of the USA could accuse Bishop Libasci and
the CDF Secretaries under secular laws as hiding the truth and then
persecuting other Catholics in the diocese.1
-Lionel Andrades
1
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/bishop-peter-libasci-assumes-invisible.html
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment