Friday, August 30, 2019

Michael Matt says Archbishop Lefebvre trained priests in Catholic doctrine - this is false.

Michael Matt says Archbishop Lefebvre trained priests in Catholic doctrine - this is false.
Lefebvre interpreted Vatican Council II with a false premise.
Lefebvre interpreted extra ecclesiam nulla salus with a false premise.
Lefebvre interpreted the Catechism of Pope Pius X with a false premise.
Lefebvre interpreted the Nicene Creed with a false premise.
Lefebvre discarded the Athanasius Creed with a false premise
Etc, etc.
This is not Catholic doctrine.
This is schism with the past popes on de fide teaching of the Church.
This is not traditionalism. It is a rupture with Tradition.
-Lionel Andrades


     




 AUGUST 29, 2019

Yves Congar and the progressive group at Vatican Council II did not know that the Council was being interpreted with a false premise. Without this premise the Council would still have the old ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return and the traditional exclusive salvation theology
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/08/yves-congar-and-progressive-group-at.html


AUGUST 29, 2019

Cardinal Reinhard Marx of Munich organised a meeting on Vatican Council II in Rome. The participants interpreted Vatican Council II with a false premise. So there was a rupture with the old ecumenism of return and EENS
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/08/cardinal-reinhold-marx-of-munich.html




AUGUST 29, 2019

Bradley Eli at Church Militant TV uses a list of false premises. He uses it to create a rupture with Tradition.So there is a schism with the past popes and the past Magisterium.Since with a false premise 'objective' exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus are created. Even the past exclusivist ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return, the Syllabus of Errors, the Athanasius Creed etc. are contradicted. This is schism. It is officially approved schism
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/08/bradley-eli-at-church-militant-tv-uses.html



 AUGUST 27, 2019

SSPX wrongly interprets the Second Vatican Council with irrational Cushingism instead of Feeneyism : SPX FAQ Videos
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/08/what-is-second-vatican-council-episode.html




AUGUST 27, 2019

Pope Paul VI and the popes upto Francis have interpreted Vatican Council II with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism. Pope Paul VI had a choice.He chose the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition : New York Times on Vatican Council II
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/08/pope-paul-vi-and-popes-upto-francis.html





AUGUST 27, 2019

Wikipedia interprets Vatican Council II with Cushingism and contributes to the confusion
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/08/wikipedia-interprets-vatican-council-ii.html


AUGUST 27, 2019


With Vatican Council II (Cushingite) there is a 'new revelation' in the Catholic Church.This liberal reading causes the hermeneutic of rupture with the past. It is obsolete since it is based upon an irrationality. A rational Feeneyite version is available
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/08/with-vatican-council-ii-cushingism.html


 AUGUST 27, 2019

People usually say that LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) when they really should be saying that they are not exceptions. People have been conditioned to see LG 8 etc as exceptions



No comments: