The Roundtable Discussion on the Eve of the Amazon Synod would be meaningles unless the participants are willing to affirm Vatican Council II and so also extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), with Feeneyism ( hypothetical cases are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church in 2019).
They are not willing to do so.
They have their interests to protect.
So Pope Francis will interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism.
He will interpret EENS with Cushingism.
He too has interests to protect.
With Cushingism there is ' a development of doctrine'.
The Roundtable Discussion participants support Cushingism in public.There is a development of doctrine for them too.
So why complain?
Doctrines can be changed with Cushingism.
For example there is no more the strict interpretation of EENS since there is alleged known salvation outside the Church.-Lionel Andrades
JULY 27, 2019
The Roundtable Discussion on the Eve of the Pan Amazon Synod organised by the Voice of the Family has schismatic participants.They interpret Vatican Council II with heretical and irrational Cushingism
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/07/the-roundtable-discussion-on-eve-of-pan.html
JULY 27, 2019
John Henry Weston and John Smeaton are not announcing that the baptism of desire (BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) refer to only hypothetical cases and are not real people known in 2019 saved outside the Catholic Church. If they would make this announcement their interpretation of magisterial documents would change
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/07/john-henry-weston-and-john-smeaton-are.html
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment