A Protestant could say that Jimmy Akins and the apologists at Catholic Answers intentionally do not interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) as it was known to the Church Fathers and the Magisterium of the 16th century.There is no denial from Catholic Answers.

A Protestant could say that Jimmy Akins and the apologists at Catholic Answers  intentionally do not interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) as it was known to the Church Fathers and the Magisterium of the 16th century.There is no denial from Catholic Answers.

They interpret EENS with unknown cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I)  being known exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.There is no denial from Catholic Answers.

They also do not deny that they interpret Vatican Council II with LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 as being known and practical exceptions to Feeneyite and 16th century EENS.

So Catholic Answers is not following the teachings of the Catholic Church according to the Church Fathers and Vatican Council II interpreted rationally.

In this video (0.29) there is a reference to Jimmy Akins book The Drama of Salvation. Akins interprets the Bible as a rupture with the dogma EENS.
He re-interprets the dogma EENS with Cushingism.He uses an irrational premise.
EENS has been infallibly defined by three Church Councils which did not mention any known exceptions.

-Lionel Andrades

SEPTEMBER 10, 2019

Karlo Broussard a speaker at the Catholic Answers Convention 2019 this month does not say that Vatican Council II supports the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS)

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/09/can-you-lose-your-salvation-by-leaving.html