According to Canon Law Bishop Frank Caggiano has no right to be a bishop since he rejects the Athanasius Creed, changes the Nicene and Apostles Creed,interprets Vatican Council II and the Catechisms as a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), the Syllabus of Errors and the Oath Against Modernism - all done with an irrational premise to contradict Magisterial documents.
Bishop Caggiano and his Curia do not deny this charge.They will not respond stating that they affirm the Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation.
They will not say that they affirm EENS like this Magisterium and missionaries of the 16th century. They don't and they know it.The 'magisterium' today is a rupture with the Magisterium of the past.So at one time the Church had to be wrong.
Invisible cases of the baptism of desire,baptism of blood and invincible ignorance cannot be visible exceptions.
They will not choose to interpret Vatican Council II with hypotheticals just being hypothetical and not a reference to objective people in the present times, allegedly saved outside the Church. It is rational but they will not do it. They have to project the Council as a rupture with the past ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.
They will not say that they affirm the Syllabus of Errors. Since Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally contradicts it.They need to contradict the Syllabus of Errors to proclaim the new ecumenism and new ecclesiology. It is all based upon a new theology based upon a false premise and inference.
With all this heresy, irrationality and confusion which is obligatory for a bishop, rector, superior or other judicial person,today, they are not obliged to sincerely make an Oath Against Modernism. Visible cases of LG 8, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc is modernism.But this is the heretical norm.
There will be no denial from Bishop Caggiano to these accusations of heresy and schism with the past Magisterium.They will prefer to ignore it.
He could point out that the Cardinal-Prefect and the Archbishop-Secretaries of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) are also in manifest heresy and schism.They are in public mortal sins of faith.This has been approved by the popes since Paul VI.
Pope Pius XII and John XXIII allowed EENS to be interpreted with an irrationality.
So there is a change in ecclesiology and ecumenism with this error.Mission was no more based on exclusive salvation and had become Christological only. With EENS changed other related doctrines were also automatically changed.-Lionel Andrades
Bishop Frank J. Caggiano at the Catholic Answers Conference this month
will officially support irrationality and heresy and the common schism
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/09/bishop-frank-j-caggiano-at-catholic.html
The Bishop of Bridgeport, Connecticut, USA and apologists of Catholic
Answers at their annual conference in San Diego this month, will
knowingly interpret Vatican Council II with an irrational premise; with
Cushingite philosophy and theology, to create an artificial rupture with
Tradition; the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS),past exclusivist
ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return, the Syllabus of Errors, Oath
Against Modernism and the Creeds and Catechisms.They will wrongly
interpret Lumen Gentium as a rupture with Feeneyite EENS
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/09/the-bishop-of-bridgeport-connecticut.html
Catholic Answers will have their annual 2019 conference this month and
all the speakers will interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise
to create a rupture with Tradition. So they admit that the conference
will be Christological and not with an ecclesio-centric ecclesiology.
They will incorrectly interpret Lumen Gentium as a rupture with
Feeneyite EENS and EENS according to the magisterium of the 16th
century
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/09/catholic-answers-will-have-their-annual.html
Catholic Answers will have their annual 2019 conference this month and
all the speakers will interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise
to create a rupture with Tradition. So they admit that the conference
will be Christological and not with an ecclesio-centric ecclesiology.
They will incorrectly interpret Lumen Gentium as a rupture with
Feeneyite EENS and EENS according to the magisterium of the 16th
century
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/09/catholic-answers-will-have-their-annual.html
Traditional Mission based on exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church
with an ecumenism of return has not changed with Vatican Council II
interpreted rationally. Since Lumen Gentium etc does not contradict
16th century extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS)
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/09/traditional-mission-based-on-exclusive.html
Speakers at the Catholic Identity Conference(CIC) are in schism with the
past Magisterium on EENS, Athanasius Creed, Syllabus of Errors, past
ecclesiology, ecumenism of return etc.They interpret Vatican Council II
with a false premise to maintain the common schism with the Left. In
this way they remain speakers at these conferences
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/09/speakers-at-catholic-identity.html
This is schism based upon doctrine and not just discipline or pastoral exercises
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/09/this-is-schism-based-upon-doctrine-and.html
CDF is in heresy and supporting schism: Pope Francis must correct the error
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/09/cdf-is-in-heresy-and-supporting-schism.html
Pope Francis must affirm Vatican Council II without the false
premise,and in harmony with the past exclusive ecclesiology of the
Church otherwise he remains in schism with the past popes before Pius
XII on extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), and other doctrines related to
EENS
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/09/pope-francis-must-affirm-vatican.html
Lumen Gentium does not contradict EENS
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/09/lumen-gentium-does-not-contradict-eens.html
The Council must be interpreted without the irrationality and then the liberals are helpless
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/09/the-council-must-be-interpreted-without.html
Conservatives are still on the defensive and allow the National Catholic
Reporter to quote Vatican Council II with an irrationality, a false
premise.Catholics do not correct the NCR and affirm the Council
rationally in harmony with Tradition ( Syllabus of Errors, Athanasius
Creed, EENS etc)
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/09/conservatives-are-still-on-defensive.html
Repeatedly there are references made to Vatican Council II in the
mainstream media and there is no correction or clarification made by the
correspondents of LifeSiteNews in their Catholic Edition
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/09/repeatedly-there-are-references-made-to.html
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment