Repost : Brunero Gherardino had it wrong and Roberto dei Mattei based his writings upon the Monsignor's irrational theology :this is now showing up in the Working Paper of the Amazon Synod

 

The cardinals and bishops at the Amazon Synod interpret Vatican Council II irrationally as did Mons. Bruno Gherardino who was a consultant for Prof. Roberto dei Mattei and Fr. Stefano Mannelli f.i.

They did not interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism, which is a rational, traditional and non heretical philosophy and theology.-Lionel Andrades

December 27, 2017

Brunero Gherardino had it wrong and Roberto dei Mattei based his writings upon the Monsignor's irrational theology

Msgr.Brunero Gherardino had it wrong and Roberto dei Mattei has said that he has based his writings on the theology of Gherardino.They both interpreted Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition since hypothetical cases were assumed to be known people saved outside the Church;Lumen Gentium 16 referred to someone known saved in invincible ignorance and without 'faith and baptism'(AG 7) in the Catholic Church.

They both also interpreted invisible for us baptism of desire as being a visible exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).This was irrational and upon this irrationality was based the theology of Rahner and Ratzinger and the Masons, which they both accepted.-Lionel Andrades