December 22, 2017
'Rome must come back to the Faith' : it does not have to be either the baptism of desire or extra ecclesiam nulla salus
Pope Benedict's doctrinal hurdle for the Society of St Pius X(SSPX) has been removed.We are often reminded by Church Militant TV that Pope Benedict said that the SSPX problem is doctrinal and so Michael Voris and his team consider the SSPX to be in schism, doctrinal schism.
For Pope Benedict, and the CMTV staff, it is either the baptism of desire or Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).It had to be one or the either.
This
was the doctrinal error for Pope Benedict.He was forcing the SSPX to
accept Vatican Council II(Cushingite) like the CMTV has done. If the
SSPX accepted Vatican Council II without the either-or interpretation it
probably would not be accepted.
Now
we know that it does not have to be either-or. It can be the baptism of
desire along with EENS since BOD can only be accepted in theory, if a
case really existed it would only be known to God. For us humans it is
invisible. So it never was an exception to Feeneyite EENS.
We have found the missing link.
We have found the missing link.
The
Holy Office 1949 made a mistake in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case.Rahner
and Ratzinger did not correct the mistake but enforced it upon the whole
Church.The FSSP and Institute of Christ the King caved. They accepted
Vatican Council II with invisible baptism of desire being considered
visible exceptions to Feeneyite. The SSPX refused.
We
now know that the doctrinal fault is not there with Vatican Council II,
in the sense that it can be interpreted without the either-or
condition.There is a choice.
The doctrinal puzzle has been solved.
The doctrinal puzzle has been solved.
When
the traditionalists and conservative Catholics choose invisible for us
BOD as being in harmony with Feeneyite EENS, and not an exception, then
their interpretation of Vatican Council II, changes.The conclusion is
traditional.
So doctrine is no more a hurdle for the SSPX canonical recognition.
Vatican
Council II is no more a problem also for the Franciscans of the
Immaculate and the St. Benedict Centers for canonical recognition.
It
would no more be a problem for the sedevacantists too since they can
still affirm the old ecclesiology but now without rejecting Vatican
Council II(Feeneyite).They must switch from Pope Benedict's Vatican
Council II(Cushingite) to Vatican Council II, without the irrational
invisible cases of BOD are visible exceptions to EENS, unknown cases of
being saved in invincible ignorance are known people saved outside the
Church.
So
now we can put aside the bar set by Pope Benedict since it was based on
a false premise and conclusion.Last March 2016 when Pope Benedict
'broke his silence' ,it was his last ditch attempt to save his new
theology now exposed in many reports on the Internet, which has got
Catholics thinking.
The
SSPX can now announce that, 'If Vatican Council II(Feeneyite) is the
condition set by Pope Benedict and Pope Francis we accept it.It is O.K.
'For
us Vatican Council II(Feeneyite) is in harmony with the old exclusivist
ecclesiology of the Church and the Syllabus of Errors.
'If
the two popes reject Feeneyite EENS and replace it with Cushingite EENS
we cannot accept their Cushingite interpretation of Vatican Council II
and EENS.
'Catholic
doctrine is precise.It is rational. There is no rupture between faith
and reason.Cushingism is irrational and non traditional.'
So
the SSPX, F.I and SBC could state,'We affirm Vatican Council
II(Feeneyite) and EENS(Feeneyite) and we reject the Vatican Council II
and EENS(Cushingite) of the two popes.
'Rome must come back to the Faith'.
-Lionel Andrades
DECEMBER 21, 2017
Franciscans of the Immaculate, SSPX, SBC can have their situation regularised : the doctrinal puzzle has been solved
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/12/franciscans-of-immaculate-sspx-sbc-can.html
DECEMBER 21, 2017
DECEMBER 21, 2017
DECEMBER 21, 2017
It does not have to be either the baptism of desire or extra ecclesiam nulla salus : Just one Religious Superior is needed to understand and affirm this and we will have changed the Church
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/12/it-does-not-have-to-be-either-baptism_92.htmlhttps://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2017/12/rome-must-come-back-to-faith-it-does.html
No comments:
Post a Comment