The St.Benedict Center Richmond N.H need to affirm, in public, Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite); the Council interpreted without the false premise and inference, and which then does not contradict extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Feeneyite).In this way they do not reject Vatican Council II and the Catechisms interpreted with Feeneyism and neither do they affirm EENS ( Cushingite) like the rest of the Church. They continue to affirm EENS ( Feeneyite) since Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) does not contradict it.
By doing this they do not allow people to label them ultra traditionalist or schismatic.
NOT SCHISMATICS
Since they are not in schism with the pope before the 1930's who affirmed the strict interpretation of EENS and did not consider the baptism of desire etc as referring to visible and known non Catholics saved outside of the Church. Why would they suppport this irrationality.
NOT TRADITIONALISTS WHO REJECT THE COUNCIL
With this approach they are not traditionalists like the many traditionalists who interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism,i.e with the false premise, and so reject the Council since it would then contradict Tradition.
NOT LIBERALS
Since they affirm Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and EENS ( Feeneyite) they would not be liberals who reject EENS ( Feeneyite) with Vatican Council II( Cushingite).
The St. Benedict Cener N.H could then ask the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith to affirm Vatican Council II and EENS with Feeneyism or else they would be irrational, non traditional and so non magisterial. They would be in schism with the popes over the centuries who affirmed baptism of desire(BOD), Baptism of blood (BOB) and invincible ignorance (I.I) as referring to hypothetical cases only.
The St.Benedict Center N.H, USA needs to affirm in public the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance as referring to invisible and hypothetical cases only. This is important even though it is obvious and really should need to mention.
However when Fr.Anthony Cekada refers to the baptism of desire(BOD) mentioned by the saints and popes, the St. Benedict Center N.H,USA simply has to tell him that the BOD always refer to a hypothetical case. None of the saints and popes state that BOD refers to visible or personally known non Catholics saved outside the Church. How could they ? This is something obvious.
Similarly when the St.Benedict Center affirms Vatican Council II, with LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc referring to only hypothetical cases, they can correct those who reject Vatican Council II.
The traditionalists, Lefebvrists, reject Vatican Council II, since they assume that LG 8 etc refer to visible and known non Catholics saved outside the Church.So this would contradict Tradition on exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.
When BOD, BOB and I.I and LG 8, UR 3, GS 22 etc are hypothetical, and they cannot be any thing else, there is no schism with EENS according to the Church Fathers or the missionaries in the 16th centuries.
LG 8 etc always refer to non physical bodies in Newton's time and space. So they cannot be exceptions to anything.
So there would not be the usual arguments made against the St. Benedict Center Richmond, N.H.-Lionel Andrades
JUNE 18, 2020
CDF officially asks SBC to follow an error: victory for Americanists ( Graphics )
CDF officially asks SBC to follow an error: victory for Americanists ( Graphics )
JUNE 18, 2020
The CDF error is supported by Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, Bishop Athanasius Schneider, the Lefebvrists and Cardinal Walter Kasper and the liberals
JUNE 18, 2020
The St.Benedict Centers have to read Vatican Council II differently (Graphics)
JUNE 18, 2020
Brother Thomas Augustine MICM, Superior, Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary at the St.Benedict Center Still River, MA, USA, is in full communion with Bishop Robert McManus, the Bishop of Worcester, USA and the CDF since he interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise and inference to create a rupture with Tradition
JUNE 17, 2020
Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano must see the error in the CDF Letter to the St. Benedict Center : all religious communities must use the false premise
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/06/archbishop-carlo-maria-vigano-must-see.html
JUNE 17, 2020
Archbishop Vigano, CDF and Lefebvrists want the St. Benedict Center to use a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II, Creeds and Catechisms to create an artitifical rupture with EENS
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/06/archbishop-vigano-cdf-and-lefebvrists.html
JUNE 17, 2020
Vigano, Schneider and Lefebvrists keep silent when the Diocese of Manchester, the liberals and the political Left (ADL, SPLC) place ' strict canonical prohibitions and obligations' upon the St.Benedict Center for not affirming EENS with a false premise and inference.
JUNE 17, 2020
Even if the Catholic Church is infiltrated Dr.Taylor Marshall can still interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise. He could interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism and not Cushingism.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/06/even-if-catholic-church-is-infiltrated.html
Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano interprets Vatican Council II with Cushingism : rupture with Athanasius Creed created
JUNE 16, 2020
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment