Archbishop Carlo Vigano and Pope Francis in the same boat

 1.Archbishop Carlo Vigano and Pope Francis are interpreting the baptism of desire, mentioned in the Baltimore Catechism, with a false premise.

What is invisible is considered visible. Their problem stems from the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 which made the same objective mistake.

2. They are interpreting 'invincible ignorance' mentioned in the Catechism of Pope Pius X, also with the same irrationality.So this Catechism contradicts itself for them and for others. 

3.They confuse the Catechism of the Council of Trent when the baptism of desire ( the desire theorof ) is considered an objective exception to the strict interpretation of EENS which they do not affirm. 

4.They interpret the Catechism of the Catholic Church ( CCC 846- Outside the Church there is no salvation) with the same New Theology, based upon a false premise. They use the same New Theology to interpret Vatican Council II. Archbishop Vigano rejects the Council while Pope Francis accepts the Council, interpreted with the same false premise. -Lionel Andrades