If Pope Francis does not force all the cardinals and bishops to interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise then the whole Church becomes Feeneyite on extra ecclesiam nulla salus

 

If Pope Francis does not force all the cardinals and bishops to interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise  then the whole Church becomes Feeneyite on extra ecclesiam nulla salus. - Lionel Andrades

___________

FEBRUARY 21, 2021

Pope Francis is forcing all cardinals and bishops to interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise to remain in good standing with the Church. Those who do not use the fake premise to create an artificial rupture with Tradition would be considered to be outside the Church

 Pope Francis is forcing all cardinals and bishops to interpret Vatican Council II with  a false premise to remain in good standing with the Church. Those who do not use the fake premise to create an artificial rupture with Tradition would be considered to be outside the Church.This is a theological epidemic in the Catholic Church. It's a doctrinal mess. The whole Church is affected like at the time of the Arian heresy.-Lionel Andrades

FEBRUARY 21, 2021

Pope Francis'interpretation of Vatican Council II is heretical.It is irrational, non Catholic and not part of the Deposit of the Faith. He must choose the rational alternative which has a continuity with Tradition.He could see LG 8, LG 16 etc as referring to hypothetical cases only in 2021

 

Pope Francis'interpretation of Vatican Council II is heretical.It is irrational, non Catholic and not part of the Deposit of the Faith. He must choose the rational alternative which has a continuity with Tradition.He could see LG 8, LG 16 etc as referring to hypothetical cases only in 2021.But if they are hypothetical cases then how can they contradict extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to the Jesuit Fr. Leonard Feeney ?.

So they are not practical exceptions to EENS, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors.

Similarly the baptism of desire(LG 14) and invincible ignorance(LG 16) are not objective cases and so they are not practical exceptions to the traditional strict interpretation of EENS.

For the pope to consider what is invisible as being visible is false. It is a false premise. An inference based upon a false premise will result in a non traditional interpretation of Vatican Council II.

Choosing an objective error which violates the Principle of Non Contradiction is not Magisterial.-Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/02/pope-francisinterpretation-of-vatican.html

______________

FEBRUARY 21, 2021

When Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II without the fake premise the conservative-liberal division ends. He cannot quote Vatican Council II to support his liberalism. The present liberalism is based upon the false interpretation of the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 (LOHO) which was accepted at Vatican Council II and has become the New Theology

 When Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II without the fake premise the conservative-liberal division ends. He cannot quote Vatican Council II to support his liberalism.

The present liberalism is based upon the false interpretation of the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 (LOHO) which was accepted at Vatican Council II and has become the New Theology.

The New Theology exists because of the false premise. Without the false premise there is no New Theology. - Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/02/when-pope-francis-interprets-vatican.html

_________________

 FEBRUARY 21, 2021

Pope Francis'interpretation of Vatican Council II is heretical.It is irrational, non Catholic and not part of the Deposit of the Faith. He must choose the rational alternative which has a continuity with Tradition.He could see LG 8, LG 16 etc as referring to hypothetical cases only in 2021

 

Pope Francis'interpretation of Vatican Council II is heretical.It is irrational, non Catholic and not part of the Deposit of the Faith. He must choose the rational alternative which has a continuity with Tradition.He could see LG 8, LG 16 etc as referring to hypothetical cases only in 2021.But if they are hypothetical cases then how can they contradict extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to the Jesuit Fr. Leonard Feeney ?.

So they are not practical exceptions to EENS, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors.

Similarly the baptism of desire(LG 14) and invincible ignorance(LG 16) are not objective cases and so they are not practical exceptions to the traditional strict interpretation of EENS.

For the pope to consider what is invisible as being visible is false. It is a false premise. An inference based upon a false premise will result in a non traditional interpretation of Vatican Council II.

Choosing an objective error which violates the Principle of Non Contradiction is not Magisterial.-Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/02/pope-francisinterpretation-of-vatican.html

_______________

FEBRUARY 21, 2021

We need to interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with 'the law of God'(John 3:5, Mark 16:16) and the past popes and saints. Pope Benedict's pontificate and tenure as the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith was based largely on the false interpretation of Vatican Council II. It contradicted the law of God

 

We need to interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with 'the law of God'(John 3:5, Mark 16:16) and the past popes and saints. Pope Benedict's pontificate and tenure as the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith was based largely on the false interpretation of Vatican Council II. It contradicted the law of God. - Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/02/we-need-to-interpret-vatican-council-ii.html

______________

FEBRUARY 21, 2021

Can a pope who interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise instead of without it( even after being informed) be a pope ? John Salza will not answer. Is Pope Francis in heresy because of Vatican Council II ? John Salza will not answer

 

Can a pope who interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise instead of without it( even after being informed) be a pope ? John Salza will not answer.

Is Pope Francis in heresy because of Vatican Council II ? John Salza will not answer.  -Lionel Andrades

__________

FEBRUARY 21, 2021

When Pope Francis said everyone had to accept Vatican Council II Massimo Faggioli criticised the traditionalists : But now we know that there is a Vatican Council II without the fake premise, which he has not used most of his life, like Pope Francis

 

When Pope Francis said everyone  had to accept Vatican Council II Massimo Faggioli criticised the traditionalists implying they had to accept Vatican Council II with the false premise and emerge liberals like him. But now we know that there is a Vatican Council II without the fake premise, which he has not used most of his life, like Pope Francis. There is also now a rational interpretation of the Council before Pope Francis and Faggioli.There is also a new interpretation of the Council before the traditionalists.

So the 55 year old liberal-traditionalist division is now fading.All are conservative who interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise. The Council is in harmony with the Athanasius Creed and there being exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.The conservative Catholics  must now continue to support Catholic orthodoxy.

Liberalism, or even sedevacantism based upon Vatican Council II interpreted with a false premise, is obsolete.-Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/02/when-pope-francis-said-everyone-had-to.html

_______________

 FEBRUARY 20, 2021

Massimo Faggioli now knows that Vatican Council II does not contradict EENS so in his concept of Catholicism and Citizenship he must proclaim the necessity of the Social Reign of Christ the King in all political legislation for the salvation of souls

 

 

 

Massimo Faggioli now knows that Vatican Council II can be interpretd without the false premise and the Council text will no where contradict the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and so it is important for all to be Catholic to go to Heaven and avoid Hell.So in his concept of Catholicism and Citizenship he must proclaim the necessity of the Social Reign of Christ the King in all political legislation for the salvation of the souls. 

The previous ecclesial division came into the Church with the false interpretation of Vatican Council II, with a fake premise to produce a non traditional conclusion.This 55 year interpretation of Vatican Council II, he acknowledges is now obsolete.It was based upon the old interpretation of Vatican Council II that Faggiolo wrote his books on Vatican Council II and received the Congar Award.Now that has all changed.

We have found out what creates a hermeneutic of rupture with the past and we can avoid it.So when there is nothing in Vatican Council to contradict EENS then the Council is traditional.Ad Gentes 7 affirms the dogma EENS and hypothetical and theoretical cases of LG 16, UR 3, GS 22 etc are not practical exceptions.

So there is a continuity with the past exclusivist ecclesiology.The Catholic Church is still ecclesiocentric.So there is the necessity of not separating Church and State just as we do not separate Jesus from the Kingdom of God, Jesus from the Church and the Church and the Kingdom of God. The Church is the Kingdom of God present now. The Church is the Mystical Body of Jesus and will be there as the Kingdom of God in the end times, the eschatological times.

With Vatican Council II not being a rupture with EENS, the necessity arises to proclaim the Social Reign of Christ the King.We can now also proclaim the necessity of the non separation of Church and State. As Faggioli says in the introduction to one of his book, there is a need need to reexamine,the relationship of Catholicism and the modern global world. This is the Catholic Church which has an exclusiveness and superiority in salvation according to the Council. Lionel Andrades

NOVEMBER 26, 2017

The Social Reign of Christ the King can be seen based on Cushingite or Feeneyite theology, Vatican Council II with the false premise or without it.

The Social Reign of Christ the King can be seen based on Cushingite or Feeneyite theology, Vatican Council II with the false premise or without it.One does not have to be a traditionalist who rejects Vatican Council II(premise-free).
Yes reject Vatican Council II(Cushingite)which would infer that there is known salvation outside the Church and so the past ecclesiology of the Church is rejected upon which is based the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King.Vatican Council (Cushingite) must continue to be rejected by the traditionalists. All Catholics should reject it.

For me the Social Reign of Christ the King means encouraging every one to be Catholic, without forcing them.So the political laws must be based on traditional Catholic doctrine and theology.Outside the Church there is no known salvation.So it is important for every one to save their soul and be a member of the Catholic Church.Vatican Council II states all need faith and baptism for salvation(Ad Gentes 7)

Catholics should only vote for Catholic political parties which affirm the Social Reign of Christ the King based on Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Vatican Council II.
This is extra ecclesiam nulla salus without the premise and Vatican Council II without the premise.

In the CMTV Download program on the Social Reign of Christ the King it is said every one does not need to be a Catholic. Bradley Eli interprets extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Vatican Council II with Cushingite theology.So for him the baptism of desire etc as refers to known examples of people saved outside the Church.Known? Where are these known examples? So since for him and the CMTV team, and the rest of Detroit, there are known exceptions to the traditional exclusivisit theology of the Catholic Church, every one does not need to be a member of the Church for salvation. So proclaiming the Social Reign of Christ the King, with their new theology,Cushingite theology, is not a priority in a pluralistic state for them.

This was the theological formation of Bradley Eli  and he s repeats it.It is the same liberal theology of Dr. Robert Fastiggi and Dr.Ralph Martin and the Archbishop of Detroit.When they support a separation of Church and State we have the present Satanic secularism of our times.We have Catholics voting for the Left which is from Satan with its support of abortion etc.

-Lionel Andrades

1.

https://www.churchmilitant.com/video/episode/download-christ-the-king

theDownload

NOVEMBER 22, 2017—CHRIST THE KING

Restoring all things in Christ.

November 22, 2017

https://www.abortionno.org/cbr-store/unchrist-like-christian/

AUGUST 17, 2017

Bishops Fellay, Schneider are not proclaiming the Social Reign of Christ the King supported by Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite)http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/08/bishops-fellay-schneider-are-not.html

AUGUST 16, 2017

Bishop Athanasius Schneider does not proclaim the Catholic Faith honestly in Kazhkistan

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/08/bishop-athanasius-schneider-does-not.html

JULY 17, 2017

Catholic political parties must teach Catholics the faith which is not being taught by religious due to political pressurehttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/catholic-political-parties-must-teach.html

 MAY 3, 2017

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/05/andrzej-dudathe-president-of-poland.html

DECEMBER 19, 2016

Catholics will not vote for the Catholic political parties :The four cardinals are using an irrational philosophy to reject the traditional ecclesiology and interpret Vatican Council II with the same irrationality

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/12/catholics-will-not-vote-for-catholic.html

NOVEMBER 18, 2016

The two Catholic political organisations are Forza Nuova and Militia Christi,  lay organisations should be supported in some way this feast of Christ the King

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/11/on-sunday-is-feast-of-christ-king-we.html

APRIL 8, 2018

So for Fr. Paul McGregor the Social Reign of Christ the King must be taught in the Catholic family and its implementation will happen in future in Russia and the rest of the world when Our Lady's Immaculate Heart will Triumph

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/04/so-for-fr-paul-mcgregor-social-reign-of.html