How can a Catholic in mortal sin remain a pope ? How can Pope Francis continue to interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial documents with the objective error and continue to be the pope ? How can he impose this false interpretation of the Council, with a fake premise, upon all the cardinals and bishops ?

 I accept Pope Francis as the pope but he  interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise instead of without it.So he changes the understanding of the Creeds and Catechisms and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. This is first class heresy.How can a Catholic in mortal sin remain a pope ? 

Like the popes from Pius XII he irrationally interprets the the baptism of desire(BOD)invincible ignorance)I.I) as not invisible but visible non Catholics who are personally known and are saved outside the Church. This is irrational. If there are any such people they would only be known to God. So the BOD and I.I cannot be postulated, by us humans, as being known examples of salvation outside the Church,making exclusive salvation in the Church obsolete. This is is the error of both the present two popes. 

How can Pope Francis continue to interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial documents with the objective error and continue to be the pope ? How can he impose this false interpretation of the Council, with a fake premise, upon all the cardinals and bishops ? 

This error is common in the Church and he does not correct it. 

Even the Lefebvrists and sedevacantists make the same mistake as the liberals.So no one  corrects the pope, since they are all part of the problem.

John Salza and Robert Siscoe author of True and False Pope will not comment on this subject. They interpreted Vatican Council II with the false premise and wrote their books.

Sedevacantist Louie Verrecchio will  also not comment since he does not want to interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise and so have to affirm Feeneyite EENS. He is concerned about the persecution which will follow for his family.

Ann Barnhardt who does not accept Pope Francis as the pope agrees that there are no known cases of being saved in invincible ignorance in the present times and that they 'exist only on paper'. Yet she too is unable to interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise  and affirm Feeneyite EENS. This is first class heresy  like that of the two popes.So she cannot correct them.

The Lefebvrists too do not want to admit that Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre made an objective mistake when he accepted the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and its irrationality which was repeated at Vatican Council II.This remained unknown to him. If he interpreted the Council without the false premise there would be no rupture with Tradition and no need to form the SSPX.

The sedevacantist Most Holy Family Monastery, USA also interprets

Vatican Council II with the false premise and not without it.Then they wrongly blame the Council. They  make the same mistake as the present two popes they cannot appeal to Pope Francis to correct the error..- Lionel Andrades

 MARCH 2, 2020

Repost : Michael and Peter Dimond, sedevacantists, at the Most Holy Family Monastery , USA are still interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise, inference and conclusion and they refer to the 'anti-popes' and 'x,y and z heretics'. They do not choose to interpret Vatican Council II with the rational premise, inference and conclusion and instead follow the popes from Paul VI.

FEBRUARY 24, 2020

Michael and Peter Dimond, sedevacantists, at the Most Holy Family Monastery , USA are still interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise, inference and conclusion and they refer to the 'anti-popes' and 'x,y and z heretics'. They do not choose to interpret Vatican Council II with the rational premise, inference and conclusion and instead follow the popes from Paul VI.

Michael and Peter Dimond, sedevacantists, at the Most Holy Family Monastery , USA  are still interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise, inference and conclusion  and they refer to the 'anti-popes' and 'x,y and z heretics'. They do not choose to interpret Vatican Council II with the rational premise, inference and conclusion and instead follow the popes from Paul VI.

I interpret Vatican Council II and other magisterial documents with the rational premise, inference and conclusion.

The MHFM need to announce the obvious i.e there are no physically visible cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance in the present times(1965-2020). This is a beginning. This is also something obvious.

So Vatican Council II does not contradict extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( EENS) according to Cantate Domino, Council of Florence, 1441,

Vatican Council II does not contradict the Athanasius Creed( Whosoever will be saved, before all things it is necessary that he hold the Catholic faith. Which faith unless every one do keep whole and undefiled, without doubt he shall perish everlastingly.) The Athanasius Creed is referring to the Catholic faith. There was no Lutheran and Anglican faith at that time. 

The Most Holy Family Monastery(MHFM) are  correct in their interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Feeneyite) while the rest of the Church is wrong to accept EENS ( Cushingite).It is no surprise that  Michael and Peter Dimond  see the rest of the Church as being members of a false new church, after 1965.Their measuing rod for authenticity and orthodoxy is EENS (Feeneyite).

The popes from Paul VI interpreted EENS and Vatican Council II with a false premise. The interpretation is Cushingite. Cushingism causes a rupture with Tradition.When it is avoided the result is orthodoxy.

So there is a Cushingite and Feeneyite EENS and Vatican Council II.The Creeds and Catechisms can be interpreted with Cushingism or Feeneyism.All papal documetns can be interpreted with Cushingim or Feeneyism.

The sedevcantists Congregatio Mariae Reginae Immaculatae (CMRI) whose Superior is Bishop Mark Pivaranus, also interprets EENS and Vatican Council II with Cushingism.

The sedevacantist community of Bishops Dolan and Sanborn in Florida, USA also interpret Vatican Council II and EENS with Cushingism. The popes from Paul VI to Francis have done the same and so no one corrects or advises the sedevacantists and traditionalists.

Michael and Peter Dimond were correct on EENS but they interpreted Vatican Council II with Cushingism.This is an error they can correct.They are not yet part of the Feeneyite Conciliar Church.They have to look at the Council with a different perspective.Vatican Council II must be accepted by the MHFM as not contradicting EENS.So there would be a new version of Vatican Council II, for them. It would be Vatican Council II which does not contradict their strict interpretation of EENS.It would mean they do not have to reject the baptism of desire(LG 14) or invincible ignorance(LG 16) and still be able to affirm the strict interpretation of EENS.

They must see hypothetical cases as just being hypothetical .Then they do not become exceptions to Feeneyite EENS and the Syllabus of Errors on EENS and ecumenism.Then they can announce that there are no exceptions to EENS mentioned in Vatican Council II. The Council does not contradict the past ecclesiology or an ecumenism of return. 1

 

 

-Lionel Andrades

1

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/michael-and-peter-dimond-must-see.html

AUGUST 26, 2018

Jimmy Akin (Catholic Answers) and sedevacantists Peter and Michael Dimond, interpret the Catechism of Pope Pius X, as a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors : no denial from the SSPX or Bishops Sanborn and Pivarunas on the same error

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/08/jimmy-akins-like-sedevacantists-peter.html

FEENEYISM ( SEE LABELS / TAGS FROM THE RIGHT HAND SIDE BAR. CLICK TO ACCESS)

• Feeneyism (110)
• Feeneyism is the missing link (9)
• Feeneyism on Wikipedia (13)
• Feeneyism.Cushingism (7)
• Feeneyismo (10)
• Feeneyite Catechism of the Catholic Church 1995 (2)
• Feeneyite Catholic College (1)
• Feeneyite EENS (1)
• Feeneyite EENS Vatican Council II(Feeneyite) (4)
• Feeneyite Theology (1)
• Feeneyite Vatican Council II (2)
• Feeneyite-Cushingite Model (1)
• Feeneyites (4)
• Feeneyites were always correct (1)

CUSHINGISM

• Cushing Additions (2)
• Cushing heresy (5)
• Cushing-Jesuit Factual Error (22)
• Cushing-Jesuit Factual Error Examples in Vatican Council II(25)
• Cushingism (116)
• Cushingism and the Catholic popes(7)
• Cushingism at Vatican Council II(1)
• Cushingism in Vatican Council II(17)
• Cushingismo (6)
• Cushingite (3)
• Cushingite Bishops (1)
• Cushingite examples (1)
• Cushingite passages cannot be exceptions to EENS (1)
• Cushingite propaganda on the Internet (1)
• Cushingite Theology (6)
• Cushingite Vatican Council II (1)
• Cushingites (1)
• Cushingites must make the correction (1)

MOST HOLY FAMILY MONASTERY/ PETER AND MICHAEL DIMOND

• Most Holy Family Monastery (56)

• Dimond Brothers (6)

• Peter and Michael Dimond (3)
• Peter and Michael Dimond at the Most Holy Family Monastery (2)
• Peter Dimond (1)

 MARCH 2, 2020

The Most Holy Family Monastery(MHFM) interprets Vatican Council II with the false premise, inference and conclusion and they complain about the popes doing the same thing. Cardinal Schonborn and Taylor Marshall also interpret Vatican Council II irrationally, just like the MHFM and the popes since Paul VI.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/03/the-most-holy-family-monasterymhfm.html

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/03/repost-michael-and-peter-dimond.html

MARCH 2, 2020

Toleration also means accepting traditional Catholic teachings like outside the Church there is no salvation, an ecumenism of return and the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King in political legislation with the non separation of Church and State (Graphics )

FEBRUARY 28, 2020

Abrahamic Faiths Initiative ignores the rational interpretation of Vatican Council II by Catholics

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/abrahamic-faiths-initiative-ignores.html

FEBRUARY 28, 2020

The U.S Embassy to the Holy See's interaction with Catholics is based on the irrational model of Vatican Council II

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/the-us-embassy-to-holy-sees-interaction.html

MARCH 1, 2020

This is unethical for the U.S State Department and the U.S Foreign Sevice   https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/03/this-is-unethical-for-us-state.html

__________________________

JANUARY 27, 2020

The former Archbishop of Munich's books published by Ignatius Press have an in- principle error.The German Joseph Ratzinger's books were written with an irrational premise to create an artificial rupture with Tradition on Vatican Council II, the Catechism of the Catholic Church, the Nicene Creed and other magisterial documents.There should be an apology from Pope Benedict and Ignatius Press.

 

The former Archbishop of Munich's books published by Ignatius Press have an in- principle error.The German Joseph Ratzinger's books were written with an irrational premise  to create an artificial rupture with Tradition on Vatican Council II, the Catechism of the Catholic Church, the Nicene Creed and other magisterial documents.There should be an apology from Pope Benedict and Ignatius Press.

Cardinal Reinhardt Marx and the German Bishops follow the same error in theology as the German pope. No statement has been issued by Ignatius Press, Pope Benedict or the Archdiocese of Munich and Freising.

At issue is not a different opinion or theology but -intentionally using a false premise ( invisible cases of the baptism of desire, for example, are physically visible) and inference ( they are objective exceptions to 16th century EENS) and conclusion ( Vatican Council II contradicts extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), the past ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return). This is unethical but it was also Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger's reasoning when he wrote Redemptoris Missio and Dominus Iesus.

Here, I do not point out any specific fault in any of the books, which do have the error. I have not read most of his books published by Ignatius Press.However I am pointing out to a general error in the reasoning of Pope Benedict.So when he uses a false premise to create a false inference and non traditional conclusion it is not an opinion,like, on celibacy, but it is a type of lie.It is a factual error. It is objectively wrong.

It is deception.It is not a 'development of doctrine', out of the blue,or over time. Instead it is a new theology created upon a false base premise and its conclusion is outside the Church there is known salvation.

This is a specific and real issue.If Ignatius Press invited a Catholic to write a book on Vatican Council II without the false premise and inference, this new book would affirm the historical documents of Vatican Council II in harmony with the Syllabus of Errors and the Athanasius Creed, which Pope Benedict has to reject.
 

For example, in ecclesiology Cardinal Ratzinger/Pope Benedict would reject the ancient teaching on the Catholic Church being the Ark of Noah that saves in the flood. Since for him the baptism of desire(BOD,baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) refer to practical and literal exceptions to 16th century EENS. Ignatius Press approves of this ?

A Catholic could write a new book in which he interprets Vatican Council II rationally, in harmony with the old ecclesiology and the Church being the Ark of Noah that saves in the flood. So there would be no pre and post Vatican Council II ecclesiology, there would no more be an old ecclesiology and new ecclesiology at that same time and the ecclesiology would be the same at the Traditional Latin Mass and the Novus Ordo Mass.

Collegiality would no more be an issue since there would be unity in theology and ecclesiology. Vatican Council II ( Ad Gentes 7-all need faith and baptism for salvation) would support the old orthodox teaching on exclusive salvation in the Church.Exclusive salvation would not be contradicted by hypothetical cases of LG 8,LG 14, LG 16 etc.

MORATORIUM ON BVI BOOKS

 

So with the built-in error in all the books of the German pope, there could be a moratorium, extended to even Cardinal Robert Sarah(a Cushingite like Pope Benedict) until this issue is resolved.

Since to use bad philosophy ( invisible people are literally visible in the present times) to create  bad theology ( they are visible examples of people saved outside the Church) is obviously a lie.This is not Catholic.

This could be the work of a someone working with an agenda or representing a lobby. He is intentionally using a lie to reject the traditional interpretation of the dogma on no salvation outside the Church and then calling it a development of doctrine. Then he says that EENS today is no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century since there is a development with Vatican Council II ( interpreted with the false premise and inference), to create this 'development'.

How can Ignatius Press in principle accept books by authors who assume unknown cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are known people, visible in 1965-2020 ?

What is the credibility of someone who keeps using this reasoning? Would he be honest on the apparitions of Our Lady of Fatima, Child Safety, homosexuality....

If this deceptive reasoning was that of Archbishop Augustine di Noia, Secretary of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF), and he handed in a manuscript for a books with the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II, would Ignatius Press accept it?

If in principle Archbishop Giacomo Morandi, interpreted magisterial documents with an irrational premise and inference, to create a rupture with Tradition, would Ignatius Press accept his manuscript for a book, since he is the Secretary of the CDF?

 

Ignatius Press needs to inform writers, like the Jesuits at Georgetown University, or cardinals, like Robert Sarah, not to send in manuscripts  which interpret BOD, BOB and I.I as referring to physically visible non Catholics saved outside the Church in 1965-2020.

They could also ask Pope Benedict for a clarification and apology.-Lionel Andrades  

JANUARY 26, 2020

Cardinal Reinhardt Marx needs to review the books on Vatican Council II in Germany. They have a built-in error. New books need to be written on the Council 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/cardinal-reinhardt-marx-needs-to-review.html

 

 

JANUARY 14, 2020

Ignatius Press needs to pull back Pope Benedict's book on ecclesiology since it was written with a false interpretation of Vatican Council II. 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/ignatius-press-needs-to-pull-back-pope.html

 

JANUARY 21, 2020

Ignatius Press needs to stop publishing books on Vatican Council II by authors who interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA, 2, GS 22 etc as being exceptions to traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).Books written by Pope Benedict also carry this error.

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/ignatius-press-needs-to-stop-publishing.html

 

JANUARY 3, 2020

 

Another misleading book on salvation being promoted by Ignatius Press and EWTN

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/another-misleading-book-on-salvation.html

_________________________________________________

JANUARY 14, 2020

Attention Jesuits : Before you write new books on Vatican Council II please do not make this mistake ( Graphics ) 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/attention-jesuits-before-you-write-new.html

 

JANUARY 14, 2020

Oxford University Press must inform authors not to send manuscripts ; pull back Gavin D'Costa's book on Vatican Council II
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/oxford-university-press-must-inform.html

JANUARY 14, 2020

All the books on Vatican Council II in the St. John Lateran University , Rome library are written with a false premise and need to be thrown out.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/all-books-on-vatican-council-ii-in-st.html

JANUARY 14, 2020

Ignatius Press needs to pull back Pope Benedict's book on ecclesiology since it was written with a false interpretation of Vatican Council II.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/ignatius-press-needs-to-pull-back-pope.html

JANUARY 13, 2020

Professors at the St.John Lateran University, Rome know that Vatican Council II does not contradict the old Jesuit interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) but they do not teach it to the students. So they keep their teaching jobs at the pontifical university.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/the-professors-at-stjohn-lateran.html

JANUARY 13, 2020

Pope Paul VI was fallible on faith.He also made a mistake on an infallible teaching of the Church, with his irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II.He avoided the rational alternative. All the popes upto Francis have repeated the same mistake.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/pope-paul-vi-was-fallible-on-faithhe.html

 JANUARY 12, 2020

Dominican Master General is in a rupture with past Dominicans with his irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II : false message in EWTN interview
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/dominican-master-general-is-in-rupture.html

JANUARY 11, 2020

The professors Tangorra, Fuss,Chenaux, Nardin,Ciola, Zak and Ferri tell students at the St. John Lateran University Rome to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and Pope Francis and Pope Benedict approve it. Otherwise the Council would support the past ecclesiology, the Syllabus of Errors of Pius IX and Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and this would not be approved by the Left, which represents Satan

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/the-professors-tangorra-fusschenaux.html

JANUARY 7, 2020

Fr.Francesco Giordano and Prof. Sandra Mazzolini's theology is political and they suggest it is from the Holy Spirit

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/frfrancesco-giordano-and-prof-sandra.html

 JANUARY 7, 2020

The Wikipedia entries on the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, Feeneyism, extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Fr. Leonard Feeney is leftist propaganda.It pre-supposes that the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance refer to visible and known exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).It also pre-supposes that Lumen Gentium 8 ( elements of sanctification and truth/ known salvation outside the Church where the true Church subsists), Lumen Gentium 16 etc, are known non Cathlics saved outside the Church.Upon this error they have created a rupture with the traditional teaching on exclusive salvation

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/the-wikipedia-entries-on-slaves-of.html

JANUARY 4, 2020

Rector needs to clarify this issue for Maronites all over the world.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/maronite-rector-needs-to-clarify-this.html

JANUARY 4, 2020

The Handook of Studies of the Urbaniana Pontifical University, Rome ( Ordo) shows like the Handook of Studies of the Angelicum University Rome ( 2019-2020) that Vatican Council II is interpreted irrationally to create a rupture with traditional mission doctrine, the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church, an ecumenism of return and extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was known to the miissionaries in the 16th century

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/the-handook-of-studies-of-urbaniana.html

JANUARY 2, 2020

The USCCB: The Nicene Creed is professed at all Sunday Masses and Solemnities within the Catholic Church. True but the meaning has been changed after the Fr. Leonard Feeney Case

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/the-usccb-nicene-creed-is-professed-at.html

NOVEMBER 26, 2019

Paul Lakeland agrees that his interpretation of Vatican Council II was irrational and artificial : it was a false rupture with Tradition. He teaches a false theology at the University of Fairfield, Ohio

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/paul-lakeland-agrees-that-his.html

DECEMBER 5, 2019

Paul Lakeland - how to be sincere and teach ecclesiology with integrity would be an issue today  https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/12/paul-lakeland-how-to-be-sincere-and.html

The National Catholic Reporter cannot keep posting reviews of books on Vatican Council II, in which the authors make the same mistake ( Graphics )

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/the-national-catholic-reporter-cannot.html

NOVEMBER 20, 2019

 NOVEMBER 20, 2019

The National Catholic Reporter reviews of the books by Fr. Jared Wicks sj and Prof. Paul Lakeland on Vatican Council II were flawed. The authors made a mistake ( Graphics)  https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/the-national-catholic-reporter-reviews.html

NOVEMBER 20, 2019

The National Catholic Reporter's reviews of the books by Fr. Jared Wicks sj and Prof. Paul Lakeland on Vatican Council II, were flawed.The authors had made a mistake. Vatican Council II was interpreted by them with false reasoning.The NCR must admit it. Both authors read the Council superficially.Then they assumed hypothetical cases were objective exceptions to the past ecclesiology of the Church. This is irrational. So the authors conclusions and those of the editors and correspondents of the NCR were irrational, non traditional and an artifical rupture with Catholic theology and doctrines on salvation etc.  https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/the-national-catholic-reporters-reviews.html

NOVEMBER 20, 2019

 Massimo Faggioli and Michael Sean Winters liberalism was based on an irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II.The National Catholic Reporter had two books reviewed, which interpreted Vatican Council II with the superficial and false reasoning.The books were authored by Paul Lakeland and Fr. Jared Wicks sj.   https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/massimo-faggiolis-and-michael-sean.html

NOVEMBER 19, 2019 Michael Sean Winters and Massimo Faggioli have converted ?  https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/michael-sean-winters-and-massimo.html

NOVEMBER 19, 2019  

The Vatican websites in general have a mistake in the interpretation of Vatican Council II.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/the-vatican-websites-in-general-have.html

NOVEMBER 17, 2019

  Pope Francis needs to tell Eugenio Scalfari that articles and reports in his newspaper on Vatican Council II have a built-in error : Andrea Tornielli needs to clean up the Vatican websites which carry the same mistake  https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/pope-francis-needs-to-tell-eugenio.html

NOVEMBER 17, 2019

 Operation Dustbin  https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/operation-dustbin.html

________________________

 

 

 

 SUNDAY, JANUARY 26, 2020

Cardinal Reinhardt Marx needs to review the books on Vatican Council II in Germany. They have a built-in error.New books need to be written on the Council

Cardinal Reinhardt Marx needs to review the books on Vatican Council II in the library of the Catholic University of Eichstadt-Ingolstadt, Bavaria.He also needs to check other educational institutions in the Archdiocese of Munich and Freising,Germany. They have a built-in error. They have become obsolete.New books need to be written on the Council.

The new books need to show how Vatican Council II is in harmony with the past exclusivist ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return and EENS according to bishops of Freising in the eight century.

Young people in Germany have to be shown how Vatican Council II can be interpreted without the error of the liberals and Lefebvrists. 

This requires re-interpreting the historical documents  of the Council.The Council can no more be read superficially.Students and seminarians in Germany must be shown how not to read LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc.They must not be seen as referring to physically seen and personally known non Catholics.LG 8 etc do not refer to real people in 2020.

They are mentioned in Vatican Council II, since the Council Fathers made a mistake. They wanted to project invisible cases of LG 8, LG 16 etc as practical exceptions to the traditional interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).

So when hypothetical cases are seen as just being hypothetical they are not exceptions to the traditional teaching on the Catholic Church  having the superiority and exclusiveness in salvation.So there is no more a hermeneutic of rupture with the past.

This is the Vatican Council II the media, academics and government in Germany need to see.It is the only rational interpretation.

The books on Vatican Council II in the Archdiocese of Munich, and the rest of  Germany, wrongly look at Vatican Council II as a rupture with the old ecumenism of return, ecclesiocentric ecclesiology and EENS according to the Patristic period.

Students and seminarians today wrongly see Lumen Gentium (LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc) as a break with the past ecclesiology. They read orthodox and unorthodox passages in the Council and think Vatican Council II contradicts itself.They do not notice that the unorthodox passages always refer to hypothetical cases. So they do not contradict the orthodox passages which support EENS and the old ecclesiology of the popes in the Middle Ages in Freising.
Vatican Council II does not contradict exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church as it was taught over the centuries in Munich and Bavaria.-Lionel Andrades

JANUARY 26, 2020

News agency reports of the past on Vatican Council II need to be corrected officially by Cardinal Reinhardt Marx and German News Agencies and also the Federal Press Conference Association (BPK-Bundespressekonferenz)

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/news-agency-reports-of-past-on-vatican.html

JANUARY 24, 2020

Questions and Answers

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/questions-and-answers.html

JANUARY 25, 2020

When the popes and the traditionalists use a false premise and inference to interpret the Council it is not just another opinion or theology, it is subterfuge. It is telling a lie officially

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/when-popes-and-traditionalists-use.html

JANUARY 25, 2020

What is being taught by the Faculty of Religious Education and the Faculty of Theology at the Catholic University of Eichstatt-Ingolstadt in Bavaria, is really deception and politically Left subterfuge.This is not Catholic- teaching.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/what-is-being-taught-by-faculty-of.html

JANUARY 23, 2020

Seminarians from the Eichstadt seminary study theology at the Catholic University of Eichstadt-Ingolstadt,Bavaria and they are taught to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally.Students from the seminary of St. Willibrand have to interpret Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) with a false premise and inference to study to become a priest.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/seminarians-from-eichastatt-seminary.html

ANUARY 23, 2020

Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Bavaria under Cardinal Reinhardt Marx, interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise to create a false rupture with EENS, an ecumenism of return and the past ecclesiology.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/catholic-university-of-eichstatt.html

JANUARY 22, 2020

Acies Ordinata : Cardinal Reinhardt Marx was not challenged to remove books on Vatican Council II and not give the mandatum to professors of theology at Eichstatt-Ingolstadt https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/acies-ordinata-cardinal-reinhardt-marx.html

JANUARY 20, 2020

It is unfortunate that young Catholics in Germany, have to re-interpret Vatican Council II,in an irrational and compromised version to keep the German church away from schism https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/it-is-unfortunate-that-young-catholics.html

JANUARY 20, 2020

Traditionalists who are in schism with the past popes on the Syllabus of Errors, the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB), invincible ignorance (I.I), the Athanasius Creed etc held an assembly prayer at Munich, Bavaria last Saturday against the 'schismatic' Cardinal Reinhardt Marx, Archbishop of Munich. https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/traditionalists-who-are-in-schism-with.htmlhttps://www.die-tagespost.de/kirche-aktuell/aktuell/Gebetswache-in-Muenchen-Dient-das-der-Kirche;art4874,204856_______________