INTERPRETATION OF VATICAN COUNCIL II BY BISHOP ROLAND MINNERATH AND LIONEL ANDRADES
Bishop Roland Minnerath has interpreted Vatican Council II with
the false premise and with this error has written a book on 'the theology of
religions' he has also interpreted the Syllabus of Errors with a false premise
and published books with this error which now are obsolete. Bishop Roland
Minnerath uses the fake premise, inference and conclusion to interpret Vatican
Council II and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.So there is a rupture
with Tradition. If he used the rational premise, inference and conclusion there
would be no rupture with Tradition.
So his books are obsolete. They were written with a false
premise to create a non traditional conclusion.
With the false premise he changes the original interpretation of
the Creeds,Catechisms and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.With the
rational premise he would emerge a traditionalist like the FSSP. The FSSP
reject Vatican Council II interpreted with the false premise and go back to
traditional sources of the Catholic Church.
FAKE PREMISE OF BISHOP ROLAND MINNERATH
Lumen Gentium 8,Lumen Gentium 14, Lumen Gentium 16 etc in
Vatican Council II refer to physically visible cases in 1965-2021.
FAKE INFERENCE OF BISHOP ROLAND MINNERATH
They are objective examples of salvation outside the Church.
FAKE CONCLUSION OF BISHOP ROLAND MINNERATH
Vatican Council II contradicts the strict interpretation of the
dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).The Athanasius Creed(outside the
Church there is no salvation) and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX (
ecumenism of return) were made obsolete.
Here is my interpretation of Vatican Council II in blue.
RATIONAL PREMISE OF LIONEL ANDRADES
LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc in Vatican Council II refer to physically
invisible cases in 1965-2021.They are only hypothetical and theoretical. They
exist only in our mind and are not solid bodies at Newton's level of time,
space and matter.
RATIONAL INFERENCE OF LIONEL ANDRADES
They are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church
for us human beings.
RATIONAL CONCLUSION OF LIONEL ANDRADES
Vatican Council II does not contradict EENS as it was
interpreted by the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.It does not contradict the strict
interpretation of EENS of St. Thomas Aquinas( saved in invincible ignorance is
invisible), St. Augustine and Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.
The Letter of the Holy Office(Congregation for the Doctrine of
the Faith) 1949 made an objective mistake it used the false premise, inference
and conclusion.-Lionel Andrades
June 29, 2021
Bishop Roland Minnerath has interpreted Vatican Council II with the false premise and with this error has written a book on 'the theology of religions' he has also interpreted the Syllabus of Errors with a false premise and published books with this error
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/06/bishop-roland-minnerath-has-interpreted
No comments:
Post a Comment